Why aren't you using Factor Zig Forums?

Also, you're still a brainlet, besides being able to use Factor's parsing words to form an `if` that has your preferred syntax - regular Forth has almost exactly the syntax you think of for an if statement if x else y then as opposed to clojure's(((((if) then (then else ) when? (if then else then)((()()())(((clojure cucks)))())

hmmm which is less retarded (sorry about my LISP syntax, I did SICP in Forth, don't really know much about LISP, but it gets the point accross)
\ Just random shit: x 33 10 */ ;: y abs 20 mod ;: word 0< if x else y then ;(define x (n) (/ (* n 33) 10))(define y (n) (mod (abs n) 20))(define word (n) (if (< n 0) (x n) (y n)))
🤔

stupid lisp clojure faggot can't even read postfix, babby duck syndrome supreme, and thinks his shitty meme popular lang is any good. Clojure is for faggots and Elixir will kick Clojure's ass in the long run

BEAM is less suited for generalized computation than the JVM. Kotlin will beat both.

Generalised computation isn't restricted by BEAM. What the fuck are you talking about?

(defn palindrom [string] (->> string clojure.string/lower-case ((juxt identity clojure.string/reverse)) (apply =)))(defn palindrom-sentence [string] (palindrom (clojure.string/join (re-seq #"[A-Za-z]" string))))

What the fuck is that monstrosity

The least retarded is prefix notation because the operation is stated first and then the operands come after. For example, "x" in your example is read "divide (the product of n and 33) by 10". Assembly operations are written like this too. eg intel syntax: "mov ax, 1" is read "move into ax, 1" and it would be "move 1 into ax" if using at&t syntax. Any C-style language uses a function calling syntax like fn(a, b, c, ...) because you want to know what you're doing first, then the details second.

Now lets look at how to read backwards-ass postfix. "33 and 10, multiply them and then divide the top of the stack by that". At the expense of parens you have something that must be read in its entirety before it can be understood. On the other hand, prefix can be gradually understood as it is read, left-to-right.

"Here's the data you want, now do this to it"

...