netbsd is also very nice yes. What advantages do you perseive it has haveing over OpenBSD though? From memory the only thing I can think of are filesystems and hardware support, and it seems that everything else is openbsd's favor. I ran it on a laptop for a very short time period.
no but it's exceedingly easy to install, just a dead simple one liner.
From what I recall my options were Devuan/Hurd, Haiku, DragonflyBSD, MidnightBSD or OpenBSD. I hadn't heard of IllumOS. I considered HelenOS and SculptOS to be too unfinished. Now all I want to do is base my choice entirely upon muh gaymes and on how many FPS I can get on AMD hardware. But the benchmarks either don't exist or aren't clear which one is superior. All I wanted was 60FPS GOTY Mountain Dew and now I'm having to migrate again.
...
I don't know what this is, but assuming it's a game that runs on linux or windows and you want to run on neither your options are: FreeBSD or modern derivative other than Dragonfly this includes MidnightBSD as mentioned and also TrueOS, and Illumos. I personally really didn't like my experiences with FreeBSD and derivatives; if you want to get to playing your game as fast as possible TrueOS would probably be the way to do it: trueos.org
FreeBSD also has shit bloated code and a CoC though so there isn't really a point if that's what you're trying to avoid, TrueOS is just freebsd but easier to install, and Midnight sort of doesn't have a CoC but they stay pretty close to FreeBSD code wise.
Illumos would be my suggestion, but it's not neccessarily easy to get going.
Let the thread spam happen, faggot, this is an important matter.
everyone better fucking use 9front right fucking now or I swear to god I'm going to fucking scream.
You do realize they have the same fucking CoC.
I really want to try 9front, but the only spare machine I have atm is a RPi3, and afaik you have to cross compile from an x86-64 install. Help me Lain.
reload the coc page you fool.
Most 9front users run it in a virtual machine.