Is wikipedia compromised by sjws?

No, that's nonsense. Anyone can edit wikipedia.

For a few minutes before the guardian who controls the entry wipes it.

See

GamerGate is an example of the blind leading the blind in terms of catalog and research. The writers were willingly blinded by ideology and the readers were mislead by disingenuous fanatics. Say what you want about GG, but I'm glad it happened, because it showed the true nature of the people behind these projects that appear to be in good faith towards humanity.

In all fairness, you can't really assert bias in mathematics articles. Physics, et all, are kryptonite to lazy, retard slacktivists because it's hard and inherently conservative, it permits no leeway.

Attached: Business Card.png (750x450, 415.94K)

Yeah I would totally trust wiki math articles.

"If you tell a lie enough times, it becomes true" -- Joseph Goebbels

Attached: 0fb9ba2b8abfd2afd3c8f56af4efa09098d7bb253edf1384270459445d2aa673.jpg (850x400, 63.34K)

This stale meme must go. Regarding your question, little babby, I tell you that most of the ((((Barnstar)))) holders on Jewipedia are israel-lovers or zionists IRL. They are moslty men on their 30s with an Hackademical backgorund and they blow the cocks of older teachers for stepping up in the judeomasonic hackademic system. [1]

I have a personal experience: as a TERMUX user, I proponed TERMUX as a landing page on Jewipedia. Alas, some ueber rabbi full of barnstars moved the page to someone's personal page, parked there to rot. JEWipedia is a megalomaniac scum where JEWS and their minions use Ad Hoc shitty rules to downplay those who aren't in the circle (a star of david circle, actually) and push up someone like Gregory Aouizerate or Corey Dale Ehmke. It is always a (((friend))) who writes the first text and then it is guarded by barnstar's SAYANIM.

JEWpedia must be gassed, d d o s e d or just ignored.

[1] Look it up what Miles W Mathis says about hackademia. Most shilled Hackademies are CIA projects from birth.

Based, also look it up the history of the page and see the missing text. It is mostly info (((THEY))) do not like.

My personal JEWpedia vandalism levels explained:

1 - I edit the frontpage. I edited Comet ping pong, Coraline Ehmke and more...

2 - Once page got blocked, I put parts of the DELETED info in questions on the talk page.

3 - At some point they even redacted or deleted the questions in the talk page, my reaction was the following:

- lurk the Goddamn jew that revised my edits
- vandalize his/her personal pages, put ironical questions there...

You should have a dynamic IP otherwise your IP will be SHUT DOWN at above step 1 -

I usually am a lovely person, but these kikes are really obnoxoius, for TERMUX they said it has no trustable sources in the links provided (on the now rotting page). I swcouted official hackademic soucres and found at least three books citing TERMUX for what it fucking does, but they didn't feel like those sources where valuable.

TL;DR they do what the fuck the jews tell them to do, so I plainly vandalize the shit that is JEWpedia.

This thread does not belong on Zig Forums. It has nothing to do with technology.

...

Attached: 008f669b861b9fab64c8a5fff0c02a80ab0fd45bb26e2281f29506c282654a8b.gif (540x422, 131.15K)

/r/WikiInAction is a good place to discuss these types of things. You’d be surprised what you can sneak in when SJWs aren’t looking. Wikipedia’s rules can be used against them if you know which buttons to push.

That video is disturbing.

web? Is that you?

weev

M8s reminder that you are on a anonymous image board.

No shit.

What a bunch of absolute retards. Don't they understand that they are incriminating themselves ? they are giving liability to people who thinks that everything where there's a jew it's a Jewish conspiracy.
They are going to get half of the world on their back one day (again) just because of paranoia and self victimization.

chinas using it to undermine the us

muh china is just as cringy as muh russia

All country that isn't your own wants to undermine other countries it's plain and simple as that.
If your country is harming itself it's probably because of the influence of the other countries.

You seriously didn't know?

Attached: 1520968091276.png (273x240, 85.56K)

The Spanish Metapedia is truly delightful. Far more complete than the English one in several topics.

Yeah they blatantly misrepresent historical facts and narratives to suit that of political lobbies(((aipac))) and also tend to promote complete lies when it comes to any kind of controversial topic. I'm really not fond of the muh jews and Zig Forums shitposting but wikipedia's editors are reddit moderator tier when it comes to certain subjects and they will actively make sure to snuff out any wrongthink

Any organization that isn't right-wing becomes left-wing. Kikepedia is no different.
Btw the edit that changed the image was en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Engineer&diff=858180146&oldid=858055500

Attached: wikipedia-white-pride.png (1303x1236, 1.5M)

Sounds to me like you think faceless corporations are destroying your rights. Heh kid, do I have an xkcd comic for you...

This. Wikipedia has been compromised for as long as I can remember when it comes to anything remotely political or controversial.

they have been sjw horeshit for years.

Attached: 645v.png (1751x828, 104.59K)

Corporations don't directly infect kikepedia, although they do sponsor the commies who do.

Attached: lotr-commie-moneybags.jpg (767x960, 111.48K)

Gamergate also showed one of the main issues with wikipedia, its accepted sources:
By design Wikipedia is going to reflect what mainstream sources say, it doesn't matter if said sources are easily proven wrong (because unless it comes from an accepted source, any proof you present is original research and thus unacceptable), so any subject in which mainstream sources are heavily biased or inaccurate will be poorly represented on Wikipedia. The solution to this would be to evaluate sources by some standard other than "it's mainstream", but that would be pretty difficult to implement. Also, anything that results in important, "respectable" sources being declared not reliable would tear the site apart. Just imagine the butthurt if say the Huffington Post was declared not very reliable.

Encyclopedias Dramatica is the only trustworthy wiki

Imagine the shame of having an ED article on yourself though; I would jump in front of a train.

Of course it's a nigger. Because niggers are exactly what you think of when someone mentions a scientist. When are we going to rid ourselves of the kike menace?

Apart from the Jewish lies, one of the most worthless groups of pages are for Mathematics. You'll find even simple topics, that'll be useful to young teens and beginners, polluted with abstract nonsense because some category theorist decided he wanted to show off to the three people who cares what he writes.

Eric W. Weisstein's (probably a Jew) Mathworld (now hosted by (((Wolfram))) ) is actually better, and it's largely the result of one man's work.

THAT'S your example? Seriously?

What is your example? COME ON NIGGER

Unless all websites count as Zig Forums topics, Wikipedia is NOT TECHNOLOGY

Posting on the shabbat? I'm telling your Rabbi.

Take it to literally any other board, but this isn't Zig Forums related

(counter saged)
It is the largest information resource in the world, it is absolutely tech related. If it bothers you, just hide the thread and go back to posting about your favorite browser.

Good morning, sunshine.

Attached: trusted_sources.png (813x616, 95.14K)

Blacks can be scientists too, you know.

Is a post about my local library Zig Forums related, then?

Attached: the_corruption_of_wikipedia_and_snopes.webm (854x480, 7.41M)

Right off the bat that first source is the New York Times, the current CEO of the NYT Mark Thompson used to be the Director-General at the BBC which covered up the sexual abuse of children by Jimmy Savile for decades.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile_sexual_abuse_scandal#BBC_comments_and_investigations

I hate everything.

Attached: 77d8529fb341189e49d9f7386d2bf03657494b31a86eb7a391b0359d7f341321.png (481x424, 261.75K)

There's the simple english version of wikipedia if you want articles with less "nonsense".

Wikipedia is ruled by liberals and liberal establishment ideology, certainly not communists. Learn the difference.

Would you just read a goddamn book already? Jesus Christ.

Attached: DOUBLE PALM.jpg (276x183, 6.07K)

Nigger, where were you back in goobergate? People might've been suspicious way earlier but it was cemented back in gg Kikepedia was pozzed

There are too many brain dead (((bureaucrats))) who are less intelligent than they think. My professor once said that one of the Wikipedia mods reverted all of his edits back to obsolete information despite my prof adding good sources for his edits. Also, Wikipedia is a massive circlejerk (in a bad sense). The mods try to gain more power over other useds of Wikipedia and they think that they are GODS because of their position in Wikipedia's power hierarchy. Then there are the paid shills who edit the articles to be in their employer's/their own political view's favor. Wikipedia also has double standards, too. If you are a jew or a SJW or a LGBTQ+, you don't need any reliable sources. Just lock the fucking article and then start banning everyone à la Reddit.

imo there is nothing wrong in vandalizing wikipedia, since the zionist shills are allowed to write anything they want whilst shutting down the goyim.

Do you know how influential Wikipedia is? Do you know why this matters?

THIS!!

If Wikipedia's goal is to spread information for the masses, why make it over-complicated? Any self-respecting academic won't use Wikipedia as their source.

Attached: gekota_and_misaka_mikoto_to_aru_kagaku_no_railgun_and_to_aru_majutsu_no_index_drawn_by_cuivre__0ada7c2104906cd8658e8646f3fda396.png (393x449, 171.61K)

Stop taking the internet seriously you retard. Wikipedia only matters because retards like and as well as the SJWs take it seriously albeit for different reasons. Nothing on the internet is a good solid source of facts, not even your pet hugbox wither you like it or not. The internet was a mistake, go outside faggot.

Attached: e2a.jpg (720x405, 16.01K)

Faceberg, Jewgle, EA, pretty much any tech company really, are openly on the left. Jewgle even had that incident where it became public they fired someone for not being enough of a cuck. Billionaires frequently sponsor commie causes, you wouldn't believe in half the bullshit you do if not for their money. I'm sure you don't consider those real Scotsmen though since you (the only real communist) and they disagree on some minor detail.

Attached: soros-femen.png (1216x570, 786.28K)

You don't need to be an academic. Nobody should be citing a fucking wiki to present an argument, period. It doesn't really matter if your wiki is somehow more accurate than professional publications on average--the very nature of it being a malleable source that can change at any minute by an anonymous editor means that a minute later the support for your argument could be reversed against it.

Here you are sitting on the internet, the world's knowledge at your fingertips with only a little know-how to search for things, and you can't be assed to spend even five minutes a day getting informed. Fuck off and read retard. You can start with this article:
wsws.org/en/articles/2018/10/15/pers-o15.html

Google has been suppressing actual leftist news outlets for over a year now, and now Facebook just this week did a massive purge of Left and left-leaning news pages. They sure as fuck aren't on the Left. I know it's really hard for you to wrap your stupid-and-proud mind around this concept, but liberals are not communists.

How about you cite one. Just one.

Of all the images of scientists in the world, they pick that one? Talk about creating a false perception. Nice try though heeb.

It was the same when Germany shut down some leftist website. You faggots pretend to be victims of some evil nazi patriarchal white censorship machine, despite defending them every time they shut down rightwingers before and saying it isn't censorship because they're the good guys. Well, it isn't censorship again, enjoy being on the other side for once.
In the same way socialists aren't communists. There are minor differences but they agree on pretty much everything so for anyone else (who doesn't care if they call themselves the people's republic or the republic of the people) they're the same.
Soros, it was in the pic. He finances shit like BLM, antifa, no borders for White countries, etc. Soros brings the money, commies the soypower.

Attached: soros-open-society-foundations.png (685x502, 93.31K)

It says, "abstract nonsense". If you weren't a retard you'd know that's how other mathematicians teasingly refer to category theory. That being said, it does look like they've cleaned up some of the elementary math articles, they used to be a bit of a dumping ground.

Would you? Do you have any idea how communism in the USSR was founded? Do you think such types don't hide behind corporations? I cannot believe you are this monumentally stupid, yet insinuate a superiority to others.

I didn't catch that. In my defense the only time I heard the term was in a category theory class many years ago.

Ah yes, the George Soros responsible for funding anti-communist movements throughout the Warsaw Pact countries in the late '80s and early '90s. Not of the shit you listed are communist, in fact that Left is often quite critical of BLM and their calls for Black Capitalism. You have nothing and you never will have anything because becoming a billionaire outright demands a person be one of the most cutthroat exploitative motherfuckers around. They would never support anything that actually challenges the economic system that gives them their power; they will never support any sort of communist movement.

Can we skip to the part where your empty liberal life causes you to swallow a bunch of pills? We've lived in your neo-liberal "utopia" for long enough--we know it's dysfunctional, just like Calhoun predicted. We need small, homogeneous societies.

(((soros))) plays both sides to create chaos and profit,.

Who funded Trotsky and Lenin?

They will support anything which confounds their enemies to profiteer from conflict, or knock out a powerful adversary.

Tell us, please.

Everipedia is an encyclopedia modernized and re-designed for the twenty-first century. Our editing interface makes creating and editing wiki's as easy as using Facebook.

Why act so supercilious? If you're so intelligent, you'd know that current society is congruous with the volkerwanderung period.

You missed my point, you are not focused on the math. History is not math. My point is that math isn't up to the same interpretation as articles about art, culture, history, politics, etc.

2+2 = 4
Can't really argue with that.

Am I getting older or has the writing on that site gone seriously down hill in the past few years? I remember ballbusting laughter on every article and now it reads like it's written by cringey Redditors and b-list streamers.

Most likely both. There are probably newer contributors just trying to ride the coattails of their predecessors, and you got more mature. 4/b/ is the same, 8 years ago I'd spend hours there, now I could not stand to even look at it.

They're working on that. The other day a CERN physicist was made an unperson for presenting facts during a feminist rally paid with money destined for science.

Attached: numbersaretoooffensive.jpeg (624x415 139.57 KB, 20.08K)

The other thing they do is try to limit the early exposure of hard topics which can cause nigger brains to overheat. Some schools have even gone so far as to eliminate AP classes, because it
might somehow perpetuate white privilege.
A typical argument is:

What a timely thread. Journalist With Actual Integrity Chris Hedges actually just did a piece about Wikipedia today:

youtube.com/watch?v=nDPrpKDjQ5U

And the article of the interviewee here:
helenofdestroy.com/index.php/49-wikipedia-rotten-to-the-core

It's very well-sourced and a good read.

Attached: wiki feminst.png (592x278 60.51 KB, 66.03K)

Why are all retarded conspiracy theorists mouth breathers. (Wikipedia is kiked tho)

youtube.com/watch?v=-gfD_-qMGmA

Attached: 2018-10-15-150446_1136x716_scrot.png (1136x716, 146.02K)

freely avaible and editable information like wikipedia was a mistake.
Read a book instead.

Off-topic. This is about Wikipedia.

LOL I'm glad you got banned.

You don't seem to understand. A reference/citation/source is not an endorsement of validity. It's just a link to where the statement or viewpoint is contained in a website or book.

Agreed!!!XDDD

Unless it's relativism and spherical/round/pearshaped earth theory.

Large amounts of vandalism on any article will make it protected.

Helen of Destroy kinda ruined the piece. Chris Hedges seems cool however.

Attached: buy.jpg (640x358 81.25 KB, 159.56K)