Symantic Filesystem

you glow too much

Not them, but using more than one cipher to test files has always been the standard. I still laugh at people that publish MD5&SHA1 on their release .checksums.
Variety is key, signing is proper.

What if I specialized the filesystem for images, audio, and video, and used perceptual hashing like suggests in another thread?

(I just realized I got Satan trips.)
I've decided that files can be deleted by writing them to a DELETE tag. This seems to be least confusing or clunky way to handle deletion. That's what I'll be working on next.

TMSU looks ideal for running locally, but adding files remotely would require an SSH session.

...

All of it: you are trying to yield everything replicable. Every step must be duplicable. If I use ZFS, UFS, RFS, etc., how do you get another peer to replicate.

I've been ignoring that thread exactly because Autobooru + Illustration2Vec has existed for 3 years now, and Spic/tech/ love to reinvent wheels for the nth time. Phproject when Haskell already does httpds with functional monads? What year is this, 1998?

-Inf IQ

>>>/reddit/

LMAO. The absolute state of Zig Forums.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collision_resistance
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_attack
>

This larper faggot still thinks SHA256 is the only hash and that everything has the same properties it does.

stop calling things "semantic". a heirarchical filesystem is no less semantic than a tagged one. you can tag a file as gay or you can make a folder called /gayshit. i'm not saying tagged systems aren't better, they're just not "semantic"

gentoo uses blake2 now, you're argument is invalid

can't wait to use NortonFS