What's so wrong with C++ for non-embedded stuff?

What's so wrong with C++ for non-embedded stuff?

Attached: unknown-70.png (266x214, 95.55K)

Good thread

It produces horrible code, write in D or write it in C, there is no inbetween.

There is nothing wrong with it for non embedded stuff. Nothing else even comes close to the cross platform support, safety, and speed.

C++ code is ugly.

because they add every possible meme feature into the spec. and then most of what is considered cool stuff now get flagged as "dont fucking use this" in the next spec. not to mention that there are those jokers who must use every possible feature just for the heck of it. C++ is a mess.

t. kind of person who thinks his own gf is 10/10

C++ just werks, ignore the fading C grandpa's who can't understand it's use.

The build systems are shit.

Do you know the difference between a language and a compiler?

Stroutsup isn't a good programmer.

It's not our problem you don't understand Make

For what possible reason do you defend the GNU build system? It's nothing but sludgecode and bad decisions.

the fuck, it shouldn't be used in embedded either. then again embedded is full of absolute retards

It's not our problem you don't understand the problems with Make and autoconf.

Learn some things before you run your nigger mouth, nigger.

make is completely fine. autoshit is shit.

It is not my problem you are using autoconf.

absolutely barbaric
there's a reason why people use higher-level languages like python and java

9/10, I almost replied seriously.

Wrong guy. I'm just mocking a nigger thinking make is GNU. Same kind of nigger using bash/ksh features while having a /bin/sh at the top of their scripts.

t. boomer

t. pajeet

you're both disgusting OO users