Is there any worse VCS than Git?

No, because then Randy wouldn't be able to pat himself on the back for being a feminist ally. Also, female representation in technical fields must be portrayed as being 60%.

Attached: internal_monologues.png (740x346, 43.33K)

You know it's true though. We use VCS to follow "best practises", but for much of what we do, that would be adequate.

I think he's never drawn any stupid character.

tfwno intelligent science gf

I have a training document/script. Let's keep it simple and say it's plain text.

Depending on who I train, only certain sections of that document is required. And sometimes, there are minor differences between the same section.

Can VCS help me manage this?

Because right now there are a copy of this document for each type of people I train and keeping them in sync when changes are made is a nightmare.

There's one where some guy is being mean to women online, and then another guy comes in and threatens to kill him.

Sounds like a good job for a shell script.

The soyface is just a method to weed out the obvious cuckolds. Of course there will be some that don't look like punchable faggots and yet still are unironic cucks.

Write your document in Asciidoc and make use of the preprocessor's include and ifdef stuff.
asciidoctor.org/docs/user-manual/#conditional-preprocessor-directives
You should still use version control for it, and maybe a Makefile.

hmmm

Yes. Every other VCS but Git is worse than Git.