It's a written excuse to ban anyone who doesn't subscribe to marxist groupthink from the project.
Code of Cuckery
Jordan Wilson
Dylan Hall
So what though? Do you really want people in your project who would be offended by anything non-PC? I can see being polite and not being deliberately offensive, obviously, but CoCs mandate far more that just "politeness".
Exactly. My question goes double for that. If Red Hat or Intel publishes a fix for a major bug or adds an essential feature, but the submitter used "incorrect pronouns" or called someone a trannynigger, is that patch really going to be rejected? How can that possibly be justified? Why would anyone risk alienating highly-skilled developers, many of whom donate their time to enforce a CoC?
You can ban people, but can't you just host patches elsewhere? Can't other people merge them with mainline? This all seems absolutely pointless and unenforceable. It just pisses people off and fractures the community and in the end you've accomplished nothing. What's the point? To force people to behave a certain way? It's just going to make people do the opposite.
Alexander Allen
I don't think I would join a project that is intentionally filled with racism. It prevents me from taking it seriously. Then again, to ward (((them))) off, you'd need some kind of offensiveness. It's a paradox tbh.
Oliver Powell
At the end of the day, most people just want their ideology to be enforced everywhere, and conveniently silence those who oppose them instead of trying to present their case on a fair argument. This is a pretty common practice among people who falsely assume that they somehow unlocked the secrets of the Nirvana or some bullshit like that and anyone who disagrees with them must be burned alive. This characteristic, however opposite they might seem at the first glance, is shared among both Nazis and SJWs.
Feels good to be a centrist, fuckers.
Elijah King
t. radical centrist that wants to kill all extremists
Jordan Foster
I think in time we will see it just so happens that all the people called out for CoC violations will be contributors who refused to merge code from RH, MS, Intel, Google, etc. Most likely pertaining to encryption, DRM, networking, etc. A half-hearted attempt has already been made against Theo Ts'o for refusing to merge Intel's random number generator, which was later discovered to include an NSA backdoor.
Aaron Scott
I would tell you to fuck off with nigger-like names for functions, changed the name of function to something that doesn't let you think of lowly niggers and that's it. As long as the code isn't shit like the naming you use, I donẗ care.
Jacob Carter
It's a convenient excuse to kick out developers without really exposing the real reason. See pic for example.
Elijah Garcia
I'm sure it feels just wonderful not to have any sensibilities and buy into the false dichotomy of modern political ideologies.
Hudson Carter
That's the beauty of it: after the goyim take the CoC the infiltrators can ban anything, it isn't limited to racism and doesn't even require fake rape accusations. Remember how Debian used this tactic against weboob? It isn't racist and the name is no more offensive than "finger", all it takes is not being marxist enough and you're a target for these trannies. Give it some years and they'll have removed most key people for being born White males, replacing them with stooges. Free software will go back to being irrelevant, something only used by a few trannies and their nerd slaves.