Tell that to China.
BOYCOTT INTERNET ARCHIVE
Milo follower count before (Twitter): 246000
Milo follower count now (Gab): 68827
Faggot's also literally broke now lmao
Alex Jones' sub count before (YouTube): 2431237
Alex Jones' sub count now (Bitchute): 31347
Again this guy's having problems keeping the lights on
Incels before (/r/incels): 42000
Incels after (incels.is+/r/braincels): 11000
Hell even if I added IncelsWithoutHate it would still be nowhere near the amount /r/incels was.
You're delusional if you think censorship doesn't work.
This.
Lolnope
Which is why Christianity is still an obscure desert cult instead of an increasingly large global influence on the sociopolitical structure of the world. Those Romans for sure never ended up converting, not siree.
hmm
I wouldn't blame them. If you're holding that much data it's much better not to have something similar stored in there.
Just archive it somewhere else, go to 4chan or /trash/ and post the video. You can also ghostpost in chan archives or torrent seed it forever.
If you're getting angry at IA it should be when they banned Zig Forums from being archived though it's archiveable now.
Imagine having to reach back 2000 years to find an example of censorship not working.
...
Well, Barbara Streisand shoahing pictures of her house sure didn't work. Neither did:
-The attempted elimination of "degeneracy", Jewish beliefs and people, homosexuality, and anti-nazi literature by the National Socialist German Worker's Party
-Bans on western and anti-revolution media in the Soviet Union- see Samizdat
-Comics Code Authority being prudes from the 50s/60s until their demise
Also tor exists.
That would have been preferable to executions and the like, yes. Then again, said early persecution was likely what gave them a lot of their popularity.
First the server is not neccessary for IPFS as you can bootstrap off of clients. Secondly the server can be changed to one that the IPFS devs don't control such as a dedicated noncensorable archive.
You encapsulate your traffic in something like obfs4 and that goes away. As for the content itself what's the NSA going to do, collect all the information they can download off that one user's archive server and all its clients and then not share it? Whatever it downloaded would have already been available by some other user. Just make sure there's always six seeders of the content, the nsa, the gchq, huweii, the russian spy service, (((the kikes))), the original seeders, and one user. That way if all the above besides anons censored the content it would still be shared.
You do realise that all those mainstream platforms, twitter, jewtube, and plebbit have bots that auto whatever. Get off those mainstream platforms and the only thing left is humans and the a.i. What you are seeing is reality instead of a deception. That and look at the benefits to alex jones, by posting on bitchute his content won't be censored as easily and be available to whoever looks for it. Vs on youtube no one would have the video unless they forced themselves to save it offline and then uploaded it somewhere like bitchute, which the content creator could have just started with to begin with.
Does archive.org have a similar public list of major financiers? It would be useful to see the groups they're forced to bend over for