Wow that motif GUI is beautiful. And the bar thing too.
Wine can do more than old stuff btw. It can do things that modern windows dropped: someday it will be better than windows itself for many old and not so old games etc.
I agree that Audacity is good and has amazing features like retuning by frequency instead of semitone and cent.
What is the best video editor in your opinion. Sony vegas? Davinci Resolve? There is a daw, ardour, that is free on linux and other platforms if you compile it instead of downloading its binary, which is for payment only.
Why do you need a frontend to mpv?
And how do you control ffmpeg's video editing features (i know that it can apply filters, etc.).
And i also remark on Inkscape! I've heard that it's good.
Why does gnu/linux not feel like real computing to me...
stopped reading, post discarded
Unix shell is awful.
The system needs an AT-compatible harddisk (IDE is fine) and EGA/VGA. Ifyou are still interested, please ftp the README/RELNOTES, and/or mail mefor additional info.I can (well, almost) hear you asking yourselves "why?". Hurd will beout in a year (or two, or next month, who knows), and I've already gotminix.
Imagine if Linux hadn't gotten successful.
We would have had year of the Hurd desktop
Windows is a nonfree operating system, why would you use such a thing? For me, personally windows doesn't feel like real computing - always broken, NT doesn't provide all drivers, but candy crush soda saga, paint 3d and xbox shit is present, because of that it somethimes can't install itself on a hard drive, because "the USB driver is missing xD", whereas Linux (the kernel, not the system) is better at providing nonfree blobs - it works always on any hardware. I remember running XP and Vista - constant crashes, BSOD, malware. The software and OS is sooooo bloated. You can't install a PRINTER driver, without restarting your computer. CMD is a joke, PowerShell starts for 10 seconds. Every small update forces you to reboot. No proper package manager, etc.
That's fucked up so badly, even systemd is better.
That would be great, but I wonder whether GNU/Hurd would have become as popular as GNU/Linux (tbh. "Linux", because almost noone knows about GNU) without accepting nonfree blobs?
A lot of companies made source code of their proprietary programs free, because they used GPL'ed code. Would it work as well for hardware?
gnu.org
Windows is for retarded people.
Linux and BSD are for big corporations or people who can run their own servers.
Right. Those corporations run Linux/BSD on their servers, and most of their retarded employees use Windows to access them at their workstations. Meanwhile there's that one fag who hasn't gotten any work done all month because he's been ricing his .conkyrc and broke X again.
Its an old picture of image-dired from the Emacs wiki.
I've heard stuff like that before, there are many incompatibility problems with Windows 9x programs on later versions of Windows so that could be useful.
I don't really use video editors that much, but I remember Sony Vegas being favored by amateurs (probably easy because it was cheap/easy to pirate back then). Adobe Premiere is used in the industry, but unfortunately Adobe's stuff turned into some SaaS-ware or something. I haven't tried Davinci Resolve personally, no idea how good it is. Every graphical video editor is going to be demanding on resources pretty much.
Thats the one I was referring to.
Because not everything is really that easy to do with command line arguments and the semi-vim interface that mpv seems to have.
I'm not a ffmpeg expert or anything, most people seem to make scripts for it.
linux is glued together garbage, stick to BSD
literally never happens unless you are dumb enough to run arch and even then that rarely ever happens.