At that point why not just make a hackintosh? crackOS makes a lot of use of your video card so you'd have to do GPU passthrough to avoid a significant amount of virtualization overhead.
First Catalina hackintosh is KVM running on AMD
What's even the point of getting MacOS to run on machines apple doesn't want it to run on?
If you want BSD any BSD is better, if you want something that's not windows there's linux.
99% chance it's this
Maybe you want MacOS for testing and a VM doesn't cut it.
Back in 2005-2008 when hackintoshes were at their peak I did not know of alternatives like BSD, GNU/Linux, etc but I desperately wanted to move away from XP/Vista/7 so I repeatedly tried to make a hackintosh on my poorfag equipment. Perhaps this is the case for others?
Apple's new mac pro is the wrong machine. Their developers need a semi-affordable tower they can load up with gpus for machine learning.
Should've gone with DTX form factor.
Then they'll both have their special snowflake factor yet still using something sane and standardized.
Shit, meant BTX not DTX.
Hardware compatibility issues. Which using a VM is helpful to smooth these problems out
Which Linux can in fact do already so its not even a big issue. You only need one CPU core dedicated to the VM so if you had an 8 core machine you can dedicate one to the host, one to the VM and still have 6 cores left for the guest OS with near-native performance with native x86 virtualization
Just got a VM working too, but fuck it was a lot more of a pain than windows VM.
USB controller passthrough still doesn't work.