Linux is a failure: Void edition

All the commands have help files. They're just as "discoverable". You've clearly never seen regular people use a computer. They don't just click around. They just give up and do things the longest possible way.

Terry also hated MITniggers and their fixation on hobbyist Linux distros. CLI is good when it's implemented correctly and TempleOS is actually pretty intuitive.

Yeah obviously the word discoverable refers to reading manuals. They needed a new word to describe reading manuals. Thank you user you sure do know a lot.

Now, I'm not sure about Arch, but there are probably distros that include gpm daemon. Meaning, you can copy/paste in loonix console.
Yaknow, if I installed 10+ new systems every day, I might think about it. Or maybe I just would write a script for it once, because it's easier than interfacing with some program to lookup possible block devices and make uuids out of them. We're working hot garbage bazaar here.
How about you shut up your stupid mouth? Are you telling me right now that with some mount options given to you in GUI without reference, you're gonna magically know what they do? That shit isn't self-explanatory, yo. Are you gonna squeeze that shit into pop-up hints? Get outta here, seriously.
Some encrypted block of data isn't exactly a filesystem. It could be anything, and mount would rightfully choke up if not for some other program to make actual addressing available. That's why you use crypttab or whatever.
I don't use disk encryption, because if glowers will come for me in my country, I will be just tortured to say all keys, and I am not sure about yours either. I mean, if there is a lot at stake for them, they might just torture you.
But AFAIK disk encryption is not really "hacked together" in loonix.
Also, what mainstream systems support full disk encryption as a part of OS functionality? Real mode: without strings attached? xD
Deniable, my ass.
The thing with that is that it's going to become continuous ongoing effort to incorporate all features, and the gain seems a lot smaller than the effort to put in. It's like with a Pareto principle.
I took my time to read as much as I could on every feature online. It included some hardware too, but not much. It wasn't the best use of my time, but now I know to a great degree how much shit I can actually disable.
So, 2 hours for something as "trivial" as incorporating SATA/FS/vidya drivers into the kernel? (well, that's what you could use it for in general) Sounds like waste of time for me. And, like, can you quickly pinpoint these features in that mess to toggle them, without any extra documentation, like online wikis? Guess not.
Whatever. CSV is fine, I guess. I legitimately don't care about format that much, and I don't see why you would. Typing various kinds of braces ()[]{} can suck it though.
I meant that configuration files themselves are not exactly easy to modify. Like, even when you use a GUI tool, it is actually NOT as easy as you make it out to be. There will be a lot of context switching, its purpose is kinda defeated if you have to put strings over there anyway, etc.
So, to make a better counter-argument to that, I think it's mostly the actual DESIGN of configs that is at fault here, not the fact that they are text files to edit.
One thing about Linux is that GUI (X Window System) is absolute shit here and I don't wanna waste my time coding for that. Well, outside of bare minimum. xD
Also (((freedesktop))) efforts to unify this mess somehow have failed too. Like, there are some good things to come out of it, I guess, like font rendering stack is pretty decent, but most user experience shit is concentrated in GTK/QT platforms, and they are both bad. There is still no uniform way to do screensaving/locking. The list is expandable.
It's bullshit if not entirely, then by degree you make it out to be useful. Well, for config editing, not in general. In general there are applications (not as in "programs", but as in "applying to something") where texting is either impossible or has much worse learning curve (though with greater potential in some cases, like, I think honestly inventing a mouse was a mistake, but inventing vi was great).

>>>/g/
See? You're learning how to design good user interfaces! Good boy!
It mounts the LVM pv after it's opened with dm-crypt you mong.
That's why you put your encrypted data into the free space of a Windows filesystem and say you filled the disk with urandom before creating the partition you fucking drooling nigger.
None, that's why I said disk encryption on Linux is a hacked together piece of shit. See? Even with brain damage you can figure some things out. Good job!

Laptop niggers can fuck off honestly. You fags are just a precursor to the touch screen retards who in about 3 years will be telling us all their great ideas about UI.

Get outta here with that nonsense.
There is only so much you can put into hints without turning your UI into shit. man mount is fucking huge though, so you would have to redesign mount interface too, which was mostly the point of the previous post.
That means if you took your time to configure a lot of other shit for that, it shouldn't be a problem for you to do a final step in fstab.
That looks like a recipe for failure TBH. I wouldn't have anything of importance on some traveling system, and if glowers come for you to your home, they will seize everything if they are not retarded. Thus, no sensitive data at home, period.
It has kernel support, so whatever.

Nice one.

kys brainlet