What non-systemd distros are relevant in professional environments even now (given it's 99% either RHEL/CentOS, SLES, or Debian)?
Zig Forums Blackpill general
Jose Scott
Chase Morris
Caleb Baker
Kayden Lee
That explains why the #1 distro on DistroWatch is SystemDick free...oh wait!
Benjamin Cox
Wine, ReactOS, Gnu+Linux
No.
That's irrelevant, as long as there are some. Also, what's the problem?
So what?
Macchanger?
No. Also they are free software, so not relevant.
Please don't forget to sage. This is garbage.
Austin Davis
Anything "professional/enterprise" is cancer.
That's why you should never apply to an IT job anywhere and just live as a hacker and freelancer.
Jaxon Thompson
Silicon will replace flesh before the century is over. There will be no mind uploading or anything like that, and complex carbon-based life won't survive. Or is practically inevitable, too. It's either back to the stone age or this.
Carson Powell
flawed and flaky
pipe dream which will get nuked from orbit by MS as soon as it gets actually useful
...plus CoC plus systemd
you do realise that honouring a user-administered hardware address is implementation-specific, as software and protocol stacks can just grab the burned-in address anyway if they so desire?
Mason Allen
The commie MX distro is not systemd-free. As a matter of fact, it always used systemd according to your very source (i.e. Distrowatch).
Joseph Price
Because you say so? Adobe went full cloud with their shit, next is MS heavily shilling Office365 (the on-prem 2019 version possibly being the last non-cloud one). So do other major players in enterprise software.