You don't really understand how the jewish media works. Not surprising tbh, most of Zig Forums doesn't even grasp the tactics used by low rung e-celebs to manipulate them as meme vectors and click bots.
I've had plenty of poppy tea this avro and am in a fairly good mood, so I'll explain a little, although I expect nothing but hostility and insults for bothering no good deed goes unpunished
It's like this, laddie:
The kikes deliberately print incorrect bullshit because the reaction it causes in their target audience is beneficial to them.
Imagine for a moment, that the "signs" simply read "TRAP: a man who convincingly dresses as a woman", "CUCK: a weak and effeminate, politically left-leaning man".
Your reaction to reading it would be "ok, and?"
You probably wouldn't bother sharing a link with your circle. The screen caps wouldn't make right-wingers go "Ha ha, wow, stupid leftsts, I gotta see the rest of this!!"
Do you understand yet?
The kikes use this tactic over and over and over again.
THEY DO EXACTLY THE SAME THING WHEN PORTRAYING RIGHT-WINGERS TO COLLEGE LEFTISTS
When the tables are turned then, instead of a distraught "leftists" on her knees, screeching "autistically" because Trump just won an election, they show "right-wing religious nuts" with signs reading "GOD HATES FAGS" or "YOU DESERVE A MISCARRIAGE" or "EVOLUTION IS A LIE!"
This gives leftists the exact same "tummy tingles" and feelings of superiority as you feel when you view "autistic screeching" or a CGI placard with a completely incorrect definition of chan inside-terms.
In other words: THE KIKE PLAYS BOTH SIDES USING THE SAME TACTICS.
Wew Lads. It's now AntiSemetic to call someone a "Globalist". Oh and Goyim...
Yeah no. When you are against an enemy that is a fog you take up a tool that works in all spacesand as you get closer to pin pointing what they look like, how they act you adjust the tool to be more effective. You'll be surprised at just how many anarchists have flipped in the past 2 years
You'd be surprised at how little worth their lives still have to me.
I feel that perhaps an actual example of the technique would aid understanding.
So here you go, this is an example of a kike media stooge playing the "stoopid right-winger" role in a piece designed to give left-wing audiences the "tummy tingle" of moral and intellectual superiority.
you just described the "red herring fallacy" or one of its multiple variants
i dont doubt that. its funny because ive known anarchists that used to protest against globalism in the early 2000s. even with their political retardation, there is no way they could stay aligned with a movement that is openly funded by the very people they used to protest against.
And while I'm here, let's look at a visual example of a sleeper agent.
Video related, this is how you destroy a party on the eve of elections.
Of course the kike overplays his hand, but normalfags have grown incapable of discerning overacting.
Stephanie Bannister of One Nation (UKIP-like party) pulled exactly the same trick. She was activated in the hours before a crucial election and (with the help of her kike friends in the mass media) effectively destroyed One Nation's electoral hopes with a carefully overacted series of "mistakes" during an interview.
The level of her feigned ignorance surpassed credible limits and its scripted nature became obvious.
etc etc.
youtube.com
Learn to spot double agents.
Beware of sleepers.
I don't believe that the debate fallacy of "red herring" is the same thing as purposefully creating mistakes in your own material.
Similar no doubt.
technically, "red herring" is both the description of a fallacy and the name of a class of fallacies
en.wikipedia.org
they are describing one of the participants in a debate in a way that makes the other participant get a wrong idea of who he is
it's a "Red herring > Ad hominem > Poisoning the well"
Ah you mean the signs, yes it can be that too. One thing you will notice about the kikes, they try to get as many uses out of each piece of work as possible. This is why their hoaxes always strike at multiple objectives.
So yes I see what you mean now, not only do the fake definitions reel in right-wingers by making us unwittingly act as advertising agents for the enemy, they also portray us in a certain negative way, in this case as supporters of rape etc.
Yes, I agree.