What you said isn’t relevant. You’re making a different KIND of statement than he is. You’re saying, “If it happens, we’re fucked.” And you’re also saying, “It cannot be allowed to happen.” He’s saying, “Statistically there’s no chance of it happening.” And you’re calling that blackpilling. You’re the one leaving potentiality open for them to win (in your prediction). There’s a damn good chance OF them winning, obviously, since we have VIDEO FUCKING EVIDENCE OF DEMOCRATS ADMITTING TO STEALING ELECTIONS FOR THE LAST 60 FUCKING YEARS.
And no one will ever DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. That’s our real problem. No one remembers the Battle of Athens. WE HAVE PROOF THE ALABAMA SPECIAL ELECTION WAS STOLEN, and Trump ignored it.
Jackson Bell
Jab a knife in your own jugular, deep state comrade
Gavin Sanchez
It's predictable because you jew fucks aren't creative and we've had this dance time and again. Eat shit moshe, get fucked, don't come back.
Tyler Reyes
He didn't say no chance. He said isn't likely. I said you cannot be probabilistic.
Bentley Sullivan
You first
Dominic Johnson
Verbatim, he said:
"likely" isn't the same as "no chance" which is how you incorrectly summarized the statement
There is NO ROOM FOR LIKELY.
Christopher Scott
Why not? I understand your implication: “if they win at all, we lose” but… the statement is irrelevant within the context of the nature of the race.
Yeah. But… what do you intend to do about it if they win?
Austin Collins
Therefore, my central point is: do not blackpill by pretending they don't have a chance to win. Any false confidence like that means something less than 100% effort to stop them might result. If there's no room for failure, there can be no overconfidence.
That particular part of his post isn't strictly the blackpill part I was referring to anyway, because he clearly says "no hope no hope" about everything else. But in a way, trying to make people overconfident when failure is a catastrophe is a similar psy op. Overconfidence and blackpilling lead to lack of effort.
It's funny how shills jump all over me the second I say all the Clinton Foundation shit needs to drop immediately and deep state has to be fought tooth and nail in midterms.
Nathaniel Scott
A better term, to stop this stupid debate once and for all, is he is trying to cause inaction through overconfidence. Whether it's trying to cause inaction through overconfidence or through hopelessness, the aim is the same.
They simply cannot win, and this ties into why I said Trump needs to dump the goods. There is no other surefire way to stop them
Jeremiah Hernandez
Too many anons run under this false idea that there is transparency and we will be seeing everything that goes on in draining the swamp. Some of it we likely won't see until after it happens. I guarantee they will not move on some of the players until they have everything in order to avoid any legal out. That doesn't mean they aren't doing anything, it just means you aren't privy to everything going on. If only Nixon were alive to see all the shenanigans. I'm sure he'd be kekking.
