Jew York Times article on Asatru

A god can do a lot of stupid things but cursing humanity with his kike 'chosen children' is un-fucking-forgivable. Would have more respect for yahweh if he made jesus an abbo.

This is true, and is in fact a cornerstone of my reluctance to attack Christian Whites - as they still carry good blood. However, as much as they do good by having White kids, some also do a great deal of damage to their children by raising them up with reality-denying Creationism. This only hurts everyone, and helps nobody.

Attached: original (6).jpg (669x539, 150.34K)

Thus why it is necessary to firmly reject Christian nonsense on Zig Forums and in every place that might be considered a concentration of civicnationalist thinking. Rosenberg indeed tried to wean Germans off of Christianity with an Aryanized version, but the upper echelons of the NSDAP were taken from folk organizations such as the Thule Society. Christianity has nothing to offer us except Christian bodies to be converted to superior ideologies. Those who do not convert simply cannot be trusted nor granted a voice in deciding the future.

The exodus narrative was created long after the conquest of Israel as part of justification for political unification of the confederation of tribes which had come to comprise "Israel" following a return from exile, not because those tribes had needed a pretext to overthrow their rivals. The twelve tribes were native to that region from the start and merely conquered their own cousins as the Ashkenazim/diaspora Jews have done in modern times to the Palestinians who are the remainder of the Israelites following Muslim conquest.

Even the kikes realize that there is absolutely zero evidence of Exodus which would invalidate their initial claim to the land. No exodus, no moses. Very interesting how the bible describes how (((600,000))) families (~2M) kikes were supposed to be in this exodus yet there's not a single slipper or pot with hebrew scribbles on it. A mulltimillion population leaving would leave tracks, and there arent any.

So yeah, no exodus, no israeli claim over the land and thus none of the rest that came after that used moses, commandments, and the relegation of the land as pretext for later events. It's all a kike lie. Thus it deserves no protection from scrutiny.

BTW, the Dead Sea materials only prove that the Christ figure was stolen from older, Aryan archetypes, and appropriated and subsequently corrupted to suit Jewish interests.

Fucking goddamn lul. Not that user you responded to, but thank you for this. I was just working on imagining it, this is even better tho.

Yes, gnostic sects of Yahwehists mixed their messianic cultism with the Aryan archetype of the world/self-conquering divine hero-king to create a Semitic culture hero suited to their time of turmoil (or rather, the unbearable possibility of peace through administration by foreign, Europid rulers). However, that undermines the entirety of the religion as it becomes clear that Christianity is both false and a distortion of Aryan ideals. Before the discovery of those materials, it was possible to speculate that the religion may have been based on a historical Aryan personage whose message was distorted by the Semites to whom he tried to preach as Rosenberg mentions, but obtaining proof of the cultural development of that figure over hundreds of years by Semitic cultists shut out that possibility.

I still think it would be possible to purify the Christ figure of Semitic impurities, remove the reality-denying Christianity from it, and gain tremendously from it. Better to at least make an attempt than to piss off every Christian by attacking Jesus.

I'm just barely starting to learn about any of this, and have been against christianity for a long time, but it blew my mind to recently find out about the origins of Judaism. How it originally started with the Canaanite polytheist religions. How Elohim comes from the father god El. How Yahweh was a separate god, and how eventually all the other gods were supplanted with Yahweh and became a monotheist religion after the babylonian exile. That's the biggest bit of evidence that Abrahamic religions are all built on shaky foundations and bullshit, and shouldn't be worshipped by Europeans. We have our own native religions, we shouldn't be worshipping a mangled kike religion. I understand the argument from Christians that it was Christianity that made Europe great. I argue that it hindered us. Europe is great because of European ideals and intelligence, not because of the kike gods in our midst.