No newfag. National Socialism is beyond your puny left-right paradigm. National Socialism is the Third Position.
Guerilla Paramilitary History Discussion Thread
Nolan Butler
Joseph Reed
Yeah, this is really obvious. You have to be a total retard to believe otherwise. They are obviously funded by (((someone))) to destabilize bad goy countries
vid related:
my.mixtape.moe
Jordan Harris
Jace Scott
I disagree with this boomer left-right paradigm.
Here are my critiques.
1. Anarchy doesn't exist. The concept is retarded for obvious reasons. Even self proclaimed anarchists follow leaders.
2. Communism requires totalitarian government. This is not me trying to be cute. You literally cannot have communism without 100% or close to 100% of people in a society (and according to communists themselves, "society" means the world population) being communists. Which is as nutty as the idea that 100% of people will adopt any belief. Thus communism requires force to compel everyone into obeying the ideology.
3. States rights are more authoritarian than democrats? In What world? Democracy in theory is 51% having tyranny over 49%. In practice, democracy is mass media corporations having near total control over 90% of the population and thus having total control over the government.
4. All these religious groups.
5. I'd rather be ruled by Genghis Khan than jews. At least Genghis Khan didn't destroy your culture if you didn't resist. America has slavishly followed every single command that the kikes issued and they STILL are trying to destroy America.
Cooper Gomez
Of course. He's a bitter old man, more down to earth than Pierce, who has acknowledged that he's not the leader type.
He wants to attract leader types to lead the resistance he envisions, which is decentralized guerilla race war in the Northwest with specific long nosed targets in mind.
He wasn't a big prominent name in Rhodesia or Ireland or anything. The only thing he did in Ireland was radio broadcasts as far as I know. That's his position. To be more of a propagandist type.
The podcasts he does are all on the Northwest Front website.
Xavier Harris
They're only a thing because of billions in Saudi, Israeli, and CIA money you fucking moron.
Also scaring arabs is absurdly easy. They're enormous cowards.
Eli Ortiz
I agree that left-right doesn't really apply to questions of compulsion. Communist countries have had by far the most intrusive governments, but they're followed up by middle-eastern theocracies as a close second. Following left-right bullshit, they're opposite ideologies, but in actuality they're almost identical.
The Turner Diaries is a pretty close depiction of how an insurrection would look, but it's not particularly likely. Any active organization would get infiltrated and destroyed, likely through planted evidence and arrest. The Commies were so successful because it was the culmination of a centuries-long march through the institutions.
1. Infiltrate merchant ports through trade contacts and blend in.
2. Create banks, work together to indebt ministers, nobles, and kings
3. Use indebted officials to gain power over money printing / minting
4. Use money to fund puppet governments and revolutions against those that resist. Control of one country will be used to bankroll subversion of other countries.
5. Slowly subvert local culture until control is total.
Steps 1 - 3 are legal, or if illegal they're fraud which is hard to detect. Only in stages 4 & 5 is any physical violence happening, and that's after years of actions by a cohesive group that has learned how to blend in to the populace. By then, they've have years to get people into the political structure, police force, etc. If we ARE the populace, we need some way of ensuring group cohesion, like a shared ideology or religion. The problem is, if the group ideology directly challenges the ruling Jews, they'll make it goal #1 to subvert or destroy it. So the only groups that survive are the groups that are so outwardly banal and pointless that no one would bother to join, and if it's not explicitly clear somewhere in their rules that they are anti-Jew, they'll eventually get replaced or bribed into being pro-Jews. This can be seen by nearly every Christian denomination. The KKK and various militia honeypots have survived, yet GLR was assassinated. Background checks and loyalty tests are important, but they likely won't be enough to stop every infiltrator or turncoat.
Our only saving grace, and it's not much, is that the government is utterly dependent on us to keep running, so a breakdown is inevitable. When people get desperate, hopefully they'll fight back. In-group cohesion rises when the risk of death is near.
Cooper Gutierrez
Essentially the left-right paradigm is broken beyond fixing. As seemingly every Marxist twat loves to point out, the paradigm originates from the French Revolution where the aristocracy sat on the King's right and the revolutionaries sat on his left. In actuality, the revolutionaries were middle class bourgeoisie but that is neither here nor there.
The issue is that this way of pigeonholing every other ism on the book as either left or right based on this one instance is specious. I can think of a thousand individual examples of ideologies that do not fit with this 18th century political paradigm. And it gets even worse in America where conservatism is considered right wing and liberalism is considered left wing. And even worse considering that liberalism doesn't even mean what liberals think it means.
So you have people arguing over terms they don't understand and positions that don't mean anything using an 18th century political paradigm that doesn't even work.
Most political leaders, "left" or "right" do not rule based on the ideas that they claim to champion. They rule based on what works to keep them in power. And promoting the fake left-right paradigm helps divide people in the same way that political parties divide people.
If people voted on issues instead of on party politics, most people would vote for less immigration, more autonomy, less taxes, and less of everything that harms them on an individual basis. Take Brexit for instance.
But instead you have a bunch of know nothing conservatives who think that environmentalism is bad because they're right wing and environmentalism is left wing. And you have a herd of pseudo sophisticate liberals who hate closing the borders because they're told that that's right wing. Even though open borders destroys unions and collective barganing for workers that they also claim to sympathize with.
Jace Taylor
guerrila fighting, lik revolutions, work only if you have a majority support from the locals or if youre backed by foregein powers.
the paris commune collapsed in on itself, like the spanish communes.
meanwhile the VC that had full support in vietnam or ISIS that had american and saudi backing managed to prevail against much stronger armies
Isaac Wilson
Assad has mostly won though.