Studying Ideologies

youtube.com/channel/UCf099SXtegD4kv9-M3GIgnw

Just going to leave this here.

Can't say that word, We ev's name or Isl am.

Which books of his would you recommend?

Lets compile a list of foundational texts that one must read to understand each of the many political ideologies that exist.

Here is my attempt at starting this. When I just list an author I mean read any and all books by that author.

Communism

The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels

Anarchoprimitvism

* Derek Jensen
* Ted Kaczynski

Anarchocapitalism

* Ayn Rand
* Stefan Molyneux

Traditionalism

* Julius Evola

National Socialism

* Leon Degrelle
* William Luther Pierce
* George Lincoln Rockwell
* Adolf Hitler

Fascism

* Benito Mussolini

Anarchofascism

Siege by James Mason
* ONA Texts

Zionism

The Protcols of the Learned Elders of Zion
olkyRarPveaKgwpVNDXPVhvUJcGoIiqDMFSNXwYfNnKbuLkKxIvEAImloIwWORFY regards, THE SPAMMER COMMUNITY lololol

Is that really all that's needed to understand communism?
Should just make a separate entry for White Nationalism.

Those are extremely important but ultimately holding our own territory is more important. Japan has a low birthrate but will be fine. We won't be no matter how many kids we have if these shitskins keep reproducing in our own land plus getting more of their kind imported all the time. Race war is the final solution. Of course people should have lots of children if they can and then fight when they are old, or alternatively, if family isn't possible then just fight.

This is not a complete list and I am trying to study the enemy right now and need more books tbh to get a good understanding of them.

I need books related to Monarchism and Strasserism and Republicanism and other stuff too.

Foundational texts that one must read to understand each of the many political ideologies that exist.

Communism

The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels

Anarchoprimitvism

* Derek Jensen
* Ted Kaczynski

Anarchocapitalism

* Ayn Rand
* Stefan Molyneux

Traditionalism

* Julius Evola

National Socialism

* Leon Degrelle
* Adolf Hitler

White Nationalism

* William Luther Pierce
* George Lincoln Rockwell

Fascism

* Benito Mussolini

Anarchofascism

Siege by James Mason
* ONA Texts

Zionism

The Protcols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Falangism? (Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera)

National Syndicalism? (Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera)

Mutualism? (mainly texts by J.P. Proudhon)

National-Mutualism? (I dont know if this is Natsoc on steroids but I read it on blog years ago)

Look at the foundation, their metaphysical dogmas and theosophic axioms, then you will know who their masters are and whom they've attuned themselves to. If you believe that we live in the imagination of an enlighten orangutan then whatever hypothesis of the world you can produce will be wrong.

Any one of them that believes that humans are cattle to be herded around, incorporates flayed theology or denies spirit is Cultural Sabbatianism and Talmudic as fuck; the masters are always chosen and exempt from their own malicious mislearnings they preach to slaves.

Not sure what category this should go in exactly but it should definitely be included.
Foundations of Geopolitics

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (271x368, 88.83K)

But thats wrong.
Karl Marx is a known name but hardly the primary author that influenced communism. It would be kind of like a republican in 2005 publishing a book about what makes republicans and in 2125 someone reads it to discover what conservatives are all about.

Put Oswald Spengler under Social Darwinism

Do the reich thing and add it there.

None of that will matter if you die and didn’t have any white kids beforehand. I keep seeing clucked whites and leftists that are simply not having children because solipsism and narcissistic tendencies tell them not to.

It’s bad enough I can’t go anywhere without degenerates harassing me and having been tortured and MKultrad by homo Jews doesn’t help. The rest of you have no excuse.

Incompatible. Spengler believed in cynical/seasonal history while Social Darwinism is based on emergence that everything is always progressing into more complexity, that the best always emerges automatically.

Can you give me some definitions of what those even are and how they constitute a unique set of ideologies? I'll nave have to read those guys.

Is that a Discordian text?

According to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics

he's a fascist.

BURN THE ENTIRE WORLD DOWN IT IS ALL SHIT

…and yet you don't bother to contribute any other communist texts.

k

It's not like I don't try all the time to do the Varg but that requires a woman who isn't an anti-natalist that wants to settle down with me.

Foundational texts that one must read to understand each of the many political ideologies that exist.

Communism

The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels

Anarchoprimitvism

* Derek Jensen
* Ted Kaczynski
* Varg Vikernes

Anarchocapitalism

* Ayn Rand
* Stefan Molyneux

Traditionalism

* Julius Evola

National Socialism

* Leon Degrelle
* Adolf Hitler

White Nationalism

* William Luther Pierce
* George Lincoln Rockwell

Fascism

* Benito Mussolini

Anarchofascism

Siege by James Mason
* ONA Texts

Zionism

The Protcols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Falangism / National Syndicalism

* Jose Antonio Primo de Rivera

Mutualism

* J.P. Proudhon

Unclassified

Foundations of Geopolitics by Aleksandr Dugin

Social Darwinism

* Oswald Spengler

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oswald_Spengler

Reading the article here on him I am now suddenly desiring very greatly to read his works.

Wouldn't he be classified as a Socialist and a Nationalist though? AKA National Socialist?

just looked him up.

the guy predicted the fall of the Third Reich

interesting fella

The anprims you have there are very different from each other. Anarcho-primitivism is mostly leftist. Post-leftist (anti-leftist) anarchists such as Ted Kaczynski, Bob Black, and Jason McQuinn are very different from anarcho-primitivists as they do not have egalitarism as one of their main principles. John Zerzan would perhaps be an example of an anarcho-primitivist in between these two schools of thought. Here is a link to some post-left anarchists essays:
theanarchistlibrary.org/category/topic/post-left

egalatarianism

Feder and Rosenberg under NS. Das Kapital is pretty essential to communism.

Hegemony and Socialist Strategy is a mandatory read for understanding social democracy's current incarnation. That book is pretty much the blueprint of the current status quo.

The communist manifesto isn’t enough to understand communism. It’s basically just a giant “muh utopia” speech without much reasoning behind it. The Capital on the other hand goes more in depth about the ideology. Sadly for the commies out there, though it does have reasoning, it is pretty shit reasoning. But, it’s better to understand your enemies than just get a brief description and make assumptions based off of that. I’d also recommend throwing in Stirner for pickle rick-tier intellectualism and anarchism then through in some John Locke for libertarianism, preferably Leviathan. Mainly those two because Anarchism and Libertarianism are inheritly different form Anarchocapitalism since Anarchism doesn’t believe in property and Libertarianism believes in some government. Then while your at it, for some base knowledge put in on The Spirit of Laws and Politics (Aristotle).

There is a book called Anarcho-Fascism by Jonas Nilsson
logik.se/Produkt/anarcho-fascism/

Germany Tomorrow by Otto Strasser

Dugin is not a fascist, Dugin's ideology is simply the reemergence of the Soviet Union using modern egalitarian language rather than that of communism.

Spengler is a historian, not a political theorist. Put him with Evola, Glubb and Guenon under "Cyclic Ages/Empire theory", which is a concept that must be understood by any actual right wing person.

Put Yockey under the Spengler category, but it's most definitely not Social Darwinism.

He's a national bolshevik if anything.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe under an-cap. I guess Adam Smith must be somewhere.

He's not national anything. In the Fourth Political theory he explicitly states that the Russian state must be multi-ethnic. You be natio-anything if you're multi-ethnic.

*can't be natio-

Hobbes wrote Leviathan not Locke.

With authentic spacing like that, how I can I refuse.

Ideally I wouldn't disagree with you but practically I do. Nationalism, nowadays at least, is just romanticising the past and chauvinism. I wouldn't say there couldn't be a thing as Brazilian nationalism even though from a race point of view it's ridiculous.
But it's rather irrelevant to try to classify Dugin. Let's just agrre that he is not even close to be any sort of fascist.

Utter faggotry.

I agree

Fuck.

oy vey its like google doesnt exist

Pick one and only one, faggots.

Oh look another thread about actual politics and not just retarded screeching is bumplocked.

The general philosophy with dialectical and historical materialism is there. Different theories and implementations are rather irrelevant.

To be fair, Mani laid out a communism millenia before Marx. It seems to be a recurring utopian delusion, but to compare a bunch of classical hippies to industrial communism is stretching words a bit too much. Granted, Mani and his followers were huge threats to the stability of the state, as well as sycretist assholes who tried to put Buddha and Jesus into the same metaphysical system.

Newfag.

Kill yourself kike. If you still use google you deserve everything that happens to you. Don't shill that good goy search engine.

Now tell me – How the fuck am I going to search for anything when I don't know what authors to search because you haven't provided any?

You're probably a butthurt Zig Forumstard anyways mad that I only listed Karl Marx.

Also at the mods, yes, National Socialism is an ideology you fucking retards. Ideology is not a negative term either. National Socialism is the ultimate and best ideology. Unban me or I'm about to have the biggest sperg out ever because this is complete bullshit, I'm 100% in line with everything on this board, and you ban me for 2 years over some bullshit like this?

Yeah no. Utopianism is not the fundamental thing in communism. Materialism is.

leftypol-reading-list.wikia.com/wiki/Image_Guides

Stop sperging at every idiot who's trying to derail the thread. And make sure you include both Marxists and Post-Marxists in your list, those distinctions are important if you're truly trying to get a handle on the evolution of modern leftism.

Varg is odalist. Probably distinct from anprim.
Dugin is nazbol.
Add the green book by muammar qaddafi to national socialism.

Just put the Communist Manifesto and Rules for Radicals, that way you get a tiny, condensed but vague bit of theory and a more practical guide to actual leftist action as observed in the real world. I'd say it's not even worth it to get too deep into commie philosophy, as everyone has their own special snowflake version anyway and any real implementation is not a true scotsman. It's also a terrible slog and mostly poorly written. Better to read something about the way commies organize and pursue power.

It's not merely utopianism: Mani pushed for the abolition of marriage, the holding of women and property in common and the destruction of castes for a universal caste of laborers. He was in the proper sense a communist, just not a marxist communist.

Stop trying to add nonwhite texts to national socialism. Qaddifi's ideology was called Religion of Cuck™ic socialism.

New thread: >>>Zig Forums11417443

There is nothing wrong with the term ideology. National Socialism is an ideology - the best one. You're an irrational idiot. There are leftists who says there shit is not an ideology and that they are somehow post-ideology whatever the fuck that means.

Saying National Socialism is an ideology is like saying Physics is not a field of human knowledge or tractors are not vehicles.

Dipshit.

Saying National Socialism is NOT* an ideology is like saying Physics is not a field of human knowledge or tractors are not vehicles.