Yeah no. Utopianism is not the fundamental thing in communism. Materialism is.
Studying Ideologies
Stop sperging at every idiot who's trying to derail the thread. And make sure you include both Marxists and Post-Marxists in your list, those distinctions are important if you're truly trying to get a handle on the evolution of modern leftism.
Varg is odalist. Probably distinct from anprim.
Dugin is nazbol.
Add the green book by muammar qaddafi to national socialism.
Just put the Communist Manifesto and Rules for Radicals, that way you get a tiny, condensed but vague bit of theory and a more practical guide to actual leftist action as observed in the real world. I'd say it's not even worth it to get too deep into commie philosophy, as everyone has their own special snowflake version anyway and any real implementation is not a true scotsman. It's also a terrible slog and mostly poorly written. Better to read something about the way commies organize and pursue power.
It's not merely utopianism: Mani pushed for the abolition of marriage, the holding of women and property in common and the destruction of castes for a universal caste of laborers. He was in the proper sense a communist, just not a marxist communist.
Stop trying to add nonwhite texts to national socialism. Qaddifi's ideology was called Religion of Cuckā¢ic socialism.
New thread: >>>Zig Forums11417443
There is nothing wrong with the term ideology. National Socialism is an ideology - the best one. You're an irrational idiot. There are leftists who says there shit is not an ideology and that they are somehow post-ideology whatever the fuck that means.
Saying National Socialism is an ideology is like saying Physics is not a field of human knowledge or tractors are not vehicles.
Dipshit.
Saying National Socialism is NOT* an ideology is like saying Physics is not a field of human knowledge or tractors are not vehicles.