To continue. You would need to get the different levers of power on your side. The media, the military, the 1%, the intelligence agencies, the police, the church, hollywood, academia.
Basically the political and economic elites.
You would need to convince them to support and fund you or think you were cool.
The final trick is to figure out how to get the people to support you, which might be much easier if you controlled the media and everything in between.
Then…..how to convince them that they should give up their rights, freedom, and hedonistic liberal lifestyle for a fascist dictatorship
Nathan Brooks
the US is too decentralized. thinking you can pull off violent revolution is retarded
Xavier Johnson
This thread is pretty intellectual so far. I agree with many of your opinions, and I think that the calamity ahead of us draws ever nearer. My thinking is that forming small bands of trusted people to operate in irregular warfare is the best strategy. (High trust, loyalty, shared goal.) The problem I have is that if all of us form small bands of trusted friends and family to fight, we are not part of a greater movement (sure, white nationalism/national socialism is one, but listen) and are not operating as a collective. How could we, spread out throughout the nation, operating independently accomplish our goal, and what would that goal be?
Let’s say the govt. comes for our guns. Let’s say we form a seven mans band or something. We launch small scale urban/guerrilla attacks, but when does it end? When our guns are guaranteed safe? When we have taken over the government? When we have carved out an ethnostate in New England or somewhere? If we are all working as singular militias, how could we band together and achieve victory? I think that’s easier if we had a formal, trained army fighting in regular warfare, which we can’t reasonably pull off, but otherwise we end up like the IRA or Shining Path.
Carson Roberts
Bumperino.
Owen Russell
Interesting with that 3.8-4 million number. Cause you have similar numbers if you have 1% of a population being fringe opposition or if the 3%ers stop being a meme
What exactly do you mean by this user?
James Thomas
honestly your dream isnt realistic at all. At most you are just going to be a bunch of fat nazi spergs larping about muh revolution. At worse even if you attacked something the government could easily squish you like a bug and you wont accomplish anything besides making the right look worse and giving the media ammo to talk about banning more things.
Basically youre a fucking retard mr fbi agent
Easton Green
Pole here, I think it might be worth considering what international impact this might have, as in how the outside forces will react to such a revolution. Should a revolution happen in the US, so it is quite clear, at least with the current situation, that the US will be split up in at least 2 factions, which will fight each other. This means every other outside country is free to interfere, since nobody will regulate this outside interference, thus creating more factions, possibly puppets, but also possibly great leaders, it all depends. Although what is certain is that countries like Russia and China will try to support their most loyal people in the US. Same goes with most of Western Europe, should they still be able to do anything(they probably will).
Now, how would an American revolution look like? Unknown. It depends on too many factors and these factors aren't clear, although a major one is the amount of division as well as irrational fear and demonizing of your opponent. Should these be high, so it is far more likely that the revolution will turn violent. Although, most of the people in the establishment are indeed opportunists. So… it might never come to it, at least a revolution won't… Instead a civil war might.
Always remember, your country is never alone, there will always be outside interference… Be it by military force, diplomacy or intelligence agencies.
David Moore
I would disagree. I see white Catholics identifying more with white Protestants than Hispanic Catholics. Though I do agree that outright theocracy would be impossible - we would far more like see ```clerical fascism``` in the Romanian style, with a secular strongman being given huge support by the various Christian churches.
Brandon Hughes
holy fuck what a glow-in-the-dark post
Luis Perez
A revolution is doubtful, likely it will be fragmentation and civil war. But outside interference is inevitable. It happened in our American Revolution, in Greece’s Revolution, in France’s, and almost in your 1830 revolution.
