But not ILLEGALS.
But not ILLEGALS as OP said.
It's unfortunate that some violent foreigners can stay but OP's headline is completely Jewish.
But not ILLEGALS.
But not ILLEGALS as OP said.
It's unfortunate that some violent foreigners can stay but OP's headline is completely Jewish.
How the fuck is he wrong you stupid fucking hot pocket? Are you fucking retarded?
(>Pay no mind to setbacks, goyim! You can only not be demoralized if you remain arrogant and assume everything is running smoothly!)
This is how dumb you look.
Way I see it is, making it clearer and less vague so kikes can't weasel around it and protect their pet spics is an objectively good thing.
On the other hand, making it harder to deport any spic for any reason is a terrible thing.
You're banning people for using new VPNs?
The hot pockets are stupid motherfuckers apparently. It's either cult of personality shit or don't do anything with these people. God forbid someone gives a fuck about their country.
I hate to say but nailing down kikes to the laws is a bit more useful.
this is what i was thinking. this is a shitty call for immigration but there are far too many vague federal laws, this call seems to be anti federal overreach overreach, not necessarily anti-deporation.
the traitors on the court don't care they'll obviously vote anyway and come up with any reason to be anti-trumpf and pro-spic invasion. from a conservative constitutional standpoint thought, and ignoring this specific law, thinking more generally, it seems to be the right call. if you have these vague fucking laws then it gives the corrupt judges even more power to twist the laws into anything they see fit. there's a lot of corrupt leftist judges doing this constantly, this could be used in the future as precedent to strike down other vague laws, laws that help the left via their corruption.
...
Accelerationism leads to South Africa. Not white nationalism.