I've heard two different takes on the Iranian revolution. One narrative is that the last Shah was a western puppet that was allowing the country to degenerate, so the Shia hardliners staged a revolution, took over the government, and since then have strictly enforced Religion of Cuck™ic law, with a militant anti-Zionist foreign policy.
The other narrative is that the Shah represented the portion of Iran that is less shitskin, that 'basically-h'whites' predominated in the northwest of the country, around Tabriz. This narrative holds that he was preserving Iran's Aryan roots and aiming to minimize Semetic influence, while modernizing and westernizing the country. The claim is that the Religion of Cuck™ic revolution finalized the takeover of Iran by the more shitskinny, Arab-ish majority with the overthrow of the 2,500 year old Persian monarchy.
The latter seems like memes to me, Middle Easterners are almost invariably muds. Whether the revolution benefited Iran or not, the status quo is that the current Iran is an enormous anti-Zionist beast that the kikes are deathly afraid of.
it's history repeating itself user, that's why they jews want to revise and edit our history, so that we forget what happened in the past and cycle can continue over and over.
There were jews in Babylon before it happened. This is how the jews repay goys who give (((them))) a home.
Ryan Wood
If you watch this, you should understand why the various brown hordes destroy history as they gain power. The repercussions will be unimaginable if the white race is not the victor this cycle. The entire is video is also a liberal friendly version of Ahnenerbe theories
Alexander Smith
The more I go back the more I get angry at the hejaz niggers for not managing to keep their shit together even after the help from the british during ww1 and being free from the turiksh niggers or being able to defend themselves from the wahabi horde that came later and formed saudia arab.
They had just fought a long protracted war with Byzantium and were bankrupt. Then a bunch of violent cousin fucking inbred Arabs zerg rushed the whole Empire and hence it's still fucked up over 1300 years later.
Jackson Cox
This is part of it. The Arabs were able to conquer the low lying regions neighbouring both Persia and the Byzantine empire, e.g. Syria, Iraq and Egypt. However they initially could not penetrate Anatolia or Persia proper. The Byzantines went into a defensive posture, wracked by both the Arabs, the plague of Justinian and Bolghar incursions into Moesia. They still had their core territories (Greece and Anatolia) and could live with that for the moment.
For the Persians the situation was very different: Persia wasn't actually a rich region and their "core" territory was actually Iraq. Their capital had been there since the days of the Achaemenids. So each new Persian king, attempted to prove himself to the Persian nobles by trying to reconquer these territories, and failed miserably each time. Eventually this weakened the Persian remnants enough that a conquest by Arabs was easy.
This did not last that long however, and the only legacy of the conquest was religion and writing script, Persia is not easily held by someone from Baghdad, let alone Arabia itself. Conquest from the north by Turks is a different matter, which occurred to Persia many times following the initial conquest.
Jayden Bailey
When the Sassanians were conquered by the mudslimes, they either had to pay the jizya and live as second class citizens, convert to Religion of Cuck™, or fuck off to somewhere where the arabs still didn't had any power. Most of them choose to convert. Since converts had the same rights as the mudslime arabs and could participate in the administration of the caliphate.
