There's always more to the story

This is exactly what drives my
RRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
These court faggots are the kidnappers and they deserve to be shot on sight.

People like that are disgusting and fuel the argument for things like birthing licenses but stories like the Alfie kid are a rude awakening to what can happen when the state, particularly a kiked one, has way more jurisdiction than it should.
So when it comes to things like eugenics, et al where do you anons draw the line? How does a nat soc / fascist / monarchist government handle health care in such a way that something like wouldn’t happen?
(Not being patronizing I’m genuinely asking).

Alfie should be euthanized.

Attached: blag.png (607x324, 11.91K)

True. In the end the child was already dead and I am sure on some level the parents already knew that anything they tried would be in vain. However, it was not for the state to decide when to end the child's sad, short life. What would have been a decision the parents would make a few years down the line regardless was stolen from them and instead of ending it on a sad but bearable "my child be up in heaven an shiet" note, the ending was "my child was murdered by the NHS" and those parents will have to live the rest of their lives with horrible fantasies like "what if we could have found someone to treat him?"
That is what is really important about this whole deal, not the logistics of keeping a vegetable alive but the ZOG's imprisonment and non consented euthanization of a kid.

Give it a couple more decades, I'd imagine the excessively old will follow the vegetables, gotta save some of that "free" healthcare (that you work for, white man) for muhomo'd the pedo goatfucker.