Civil War

For your your education, listening pleasure, and to provide content to an important topic I have read aloud all of "Civil War 2 - The Coming Breakup of America" and uploaded it here:
mega.nz/#F!aFgAiY6D!Rmsnp33-LcBAfkdHHUVHxA

Over 20 years ago, Thomas W. Chittum's advice, observations, and predictions are largely more relevant than ever. It's scary and exciting how much his painting of the future resembles the world we live in. He didn't account for some things (mostly the impact of the internet), but for any of you not already experts on the subject of the coming intra-national conflicts it's a very good read, or listen if you prefer. For those of you who are experts perhaps you have some more to offer us in this thread.

Areas of the book I would like to see expanded on are:

Civil war general.

Attached: civil war 2 chittam.jpg (324x499, 46.56K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mega.nz/#F!aFgAiY6D!Rmsnp33-LcBAfkdHHUVHxA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nipigon_River_Bridge
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Any pics like these welcome, too.

Attached: Civil war 2.png (583x394 202.78 KB, 50.69K)

I meant "later", btw.

Bump, good job OP.

Attached: 1509740582226.gif (250x194, 47.42K)

Your map is slightly flawed
This one is a bit more accurate. It doesn't show new north USA (former cucknada) or new south USA formerly mexico
We own it all. That wall is to protect beaners from me

Attached: IMG_3233.PNG (920x569, 54.18K)

Keep thinkin' small.

We'll get there. We will conquer this galaxy and move on to conquer others
White men will not be stopped ever. This map and mental projection are merely a first step

I say we just declare victory now, and spend eternity immersed in the truth of supreme consciousness.

Attached: US_civil_war_rebel_leader_TOM.png (1280x800 136.95 KB, 145.75K)

Done deal
SIEG HEIL
VICTORY

HAIL VICTORY

Attached: 54231300b84f170c859eaf1b475b8dc275156472073b8a5c405710f23ddd2265.jpg (480x309, 21.28K)

I sometimes use this book as a stepping stone for conservatives into racial politics. They all know this is true. And the implications are that we should all stick together as Whites.
Noticing the jew comes later.

West Virginia.
Now technically the best state to be in would be like Idaho or some place far away. Maybe even Russia. But I want to participate and I want to do it from the high ground.

Something to do with supplies.

Speaking of which
Water and water purification. You can survive with little food. You can survive with only one gun. But you cannot survive without water. Water is key. All else comes second.
Another thing to get is alcohol and construction material. Alcohol is for trading, not drinking. And construction material is for your house.
Get your car fixed and your health taken care of before SHTF.

1. I'm pretty sure any little backwater a good distance from major cities should work nicely. I'm from Maine and will be riding out whatever happens there. We'll got forgotten about instantly and the human vermin in Boston and New Yawk are gonna drift south rather than north when the lights go out.

2. Honestly a welder/some sort of vehicle mechanic would be huge. When rebel/insurgent armies transition from foot-based militia to something more resembling a proper military, they're going to need vehicles, weapons, etc. Rolling around in some vietnam-era gun trucks emblazoned with swastikas

3. There's far better guides out there than I can put in here, but if you're expecting to barter or trade supplies, loot the absolute hell of the cartons of cigarettes from the nearby gas stations and store them. A month goes by and those will be worth their weight in gold to smokers.

Attached: King-Kong-File0047.jpg (1082x590, 128.84K)

Thank you, good points. I'm in Alaska. Water is not so much a problem. Cold is obviously a problem, it ruins everything. Food could easily be a problem, as most of what Alaskans eat is imported. Demographics are sketchy. The natives are already pretty hostile, and I don't like most of those ugly fucks either. Small towns are pretty nice, though. Getting into a nice community would probably be the best bet for this state. Gotta bring a valuable skill, though.


Appreciate it. I do work on my own vehicles already. Welding would be a good skill. In the event the nothing happens in my lifetime, though, I'd hate to have spent my life welding or fixing cars. Definitely appreciate more suggestions on the skill/profession front.

Here's some SHTF related images.

Attached: b0c84fb2358c6902e271881dffaf87c10aa583583d2619c668b5072698ff2f6a.jpg (1284x2076 293.49 KB, 468.77K)

Am I a kike faggot for unironically thinking that US map could work? The races do have their differences but I don't necessarily hate them.

...

You mean ZOG will destroy us all in nuclear fire.

Because there never was any hope.

Wew.
Forgot about Alaska.
If the central government collapsed, the governor would declare martial law and basically act as an autonomous state. Assuming the collapse was not global in nature, trade would continue with Russia & China and Alaska would end up fighting piracy coming from California. You'd become like Venice.
The good thing would be that your non-White problem wouldn't be nearly so bad. The downside, as you say is your population and food imports.
However since the important parts of Alaska are homogeneous, I think you'll be alright in the long term.
I hope that whoever manages to seize power in Alaska is pro-White and anti-jew.

Lot of liquor there. You could set up a network where you trade food for liquor.

Attached: Cooking rabbits we haven't caught.webm (640x360, 8.12M)

Even you hope too much. There are no rabbits to catch. We'll simply starve.

You sure you want to be land-locked?

Agreed, WV would make a good fortress, but nothing more.

There isn't anywhere for us to run. There isn't anywhere to hole up. There isn't anywhere that isn't reachable by nuclear warhead or biological payload or chemical rockets.

Black fire in the skies! GEHENNA IS UPON US!

Damn OP, you're pumping out audiobooks like no tomorrow. Good job

Yes, you're a kike. Conceding any land to blacks and spics is inexcusable.

I'm sure it comes easy for you jew, to lose hope now.

You'll starve on rabbits too

Attached: 1434418687409.jpg (566x480, 65.46K)

Checked, not an inch to the mongrel horde.

I must mention this: don't be surprised if the majority of Southerners take a bit longer than normal before venturing beyond the borders of pic related to assist other pockets of Zig Forumsacks and/or streloks out there. While racial tensions have been building up in Dixie for generations, King Nigger positioned things to be so damn edge-of-the-cliff tense that I would bet money on those good old boys making sure every last nog has been goodified and a makeshift government set up before crossing into the North or the Frontier West.

Attached: New Southern Confederation.png (1513x983, 38.73K)

Oh there are (((rabbits))) alright. They know we exist and we know that they exist. The problem is catching them.
My point is not to construct castles in the sky. Better not to get too caught up in imagining our plan's happy ending and ignoring the great challenge we will face in achieving it.
I don't plan on colonizing Africa. Africa doesn't exist to me. Only White nations exist and only White nations are important. Their liberation from the jewish parasites is all that concerns me at this time. Only after jewish power is destroyed will I contemplate how to deal with the other races. If I do.


I'd rather be a landlocked White nation than a multicultural one with access to the sea.
Besides, ITT the idea is the realization of Thomas Chittum's predictions. If that happens as he predicted, we will have access to the sea very soon.
My rationel for West Virginia is
1. It's racially homogeneous
2. I like the foliage and temperature (great for gardening.
3. Mountain passes. Greak choak points in case of defense.
4. In case of offense, it is close to the Pentagon.
5. Nice people if you don't behave like a rubberneck liberal jackass.
6. In the event of a nuclear war, I'll sleep soundly knowing that no one would nuke West Virginia.

I am aware of the drawbacks though. The disgusting kikes have flooded the place with opiods and poisoned entire generations with disease and degeneracy. It really is disgusting to even think about what they have done. We really do need a Golden Dawn to shoot drug dealers and clean up this mess.
Also, frakking is a problem.
It's a shame the kikes turned environmentalism into a "liberal" issue.

IF you let texas go to the shitskinn hoards you doom your nation to an rinse repeat cycle. The reasons strategically should be very apparent if you are even the slightest bit prepared on how to lead and wage war beyond an squat tactics level understanding.

Interesting. I imagine Alaska shrinking significantly in population density if anything serious happens. This is an already sparsely populated giant landmass, so it's one of the few places where one might be able to survive off hunted animals longterm. Get one moose, and have some backup stuff like beans and rice, and you can keep a small family going all winter. Of course if I'm wrong then cannibalism is around the corner.


There's already illegal liquor trade operations (to native villages), but I don't want to get my throat slit by prideful natives who found out I was exploiting their people's susceptibility to alcohol. Maybe it wouldn't be a problem, but I think I'll stick to developing a marketable skill that doesn't involve me in people's addictions.


Thank you. I actually slowed down, but I'll have Goebbels done soon.


That picture isn't a goal, it's from the book; a prediction of where the frontlines of battle might be.

Attached: innawoods guide 5.jpg (1000x1200 639.78 KB, 225K)

>mega.nz/#F!aFgAiY6D!Rmsnp33-LcBAfkdHHUVHxA
The last two files are undecrypted, you need to update the link for people to be able to access them. Otherwise, great work.

Oops. Not sure how that happened. Try it now.

Indeed. Some of you may be able to hunt and survive. Another factor though is fishing. I don't foresee a huge die-off per-se. In the event of a collapse of course.
The White population can probably subsist off of fishing, caribue hunting, and trading oil and natural resources for food imports. Your real trouble will be fending off piracy and foreign influence.
You all may be far from Moscow but Alaska is strategically important none the less. If I were Putin, I'd flood Alaska with food in return for political favors (it's not like Alaska produces anything Russia doesn't already). Of course, will he be president by the time this happens? if it happens
A cunning president might satellite Alaskan leaders or at least try to. But what if the kikes replace Putin with another Boris Yeltsin?
Another trick that a ruthless president might try is moving their Pacific navy into Alaskan waters and protecting Alaskan trade. Who could refuse such a generous offer?

…who indeed?

Of course whoever seizes power and declares martial law will be a defacto tyrant. Of which faction will he be? There are the neocons. A powerful block. But then I hear that Alaskans have a strong patriotic streak about them and are less authoritarian than Republicans in the south.

Yeah, freedom is the main attraction of Alaska. I don't know what kind of resistance people here would be able to put up so spread out and low in number, but infringement on what we perceive as natural rights (of course you and I know there is only natural law) wouldn't go over well. Many of us already want the local government dead for fucking with us. It's this that might even bridge a gap between the whites and natives here.

What are your thoughts on Canada? Will it be consumed by white identity? I'd like there to not be another country between me and the rest of my country.

A second civil war in America will mean victory for the globalists. You can not win if you try to fight army vs army like that moron Robert E. Lee tried. The North had the major port city of New York with unlimited Irish streaming in and the industry. Combine that with the railroads and the South is out manned, out supplied, and out maneuvered with logistics. In the modern context the liberals/globalists own the major port cities in North America, can bring in unlimited 3rd worlders to man an Army, and have unlimited goods coming in from overseas. They also own the Federal Government with the monetary power. The only way to win is to burn it all down, leave nothing but ashes from coast to coast, and kill every shitskin just to be safe. Anything less will result in defeat.

Attached: 5 -Desolation.jpg (4361x2768, 2.23M)

You know what the port cities have an awful lot of? Diversity. Civil War 2 is gearing up to be racial. Those will not be stable ports for liberals, especially those being surrounded by right wing whites.

Works now, thanks.

Yeah straight-off-the-boat Achmed is going to be prime army material, he'll show those Reb's who is boss! I am also sure that he wont do anything to alienate the people in the towns he will occupy, thus earning a slit throat when he tries to sleep.

Western Canada is irrelevant. Sad but true. The only significant population center in western Canada is Vancouver. I remember a while back there was this one bridge that connects the east with the west that collapsed and the entire country was effectively cut in half.
I don't know what kind of racial sentiment the Anglo-Saxons of western Canada possess, but if SHTF, they'd be on their own. Vancouver is something like half White and half Asian. But it'd probably be absorbed into Cascadia within days of its formation. At least defacto. Dejure is another matter and I doubt there will be much official annexation of land. It's just not done for various reasons.
But even if it did happen, there's no way for Cascadian patriots to reach you guys in Alaska. Not by land.
So the new question is; which way does the navy swing? An intelligent admiral wouldn't jump into the fray immediately. If they side wih the central government, then everything will be chaotic. But the liberal Seattle and California Coast governments might pressure them into making such a choice.
Honestly, if I were an admiral in this situation, I'd sit on my ass and do nothing until Cascadia got its act together and then marched on Seattle. Then I'd turn my guns on the liberal traitors and hand them over to the angry mob as a gift. This is not just me being biased in favor of White people. It's just the smart choice.
If that happens, Alaskan leaders should join with Cascadia and then they'd be safe from Russian interference. At least it'd be safer.
Joining with Washington would be a meaningless act as they're too far away to matter.

In any case, Canada is irrelevant as far as an Alaskan is concerned. The east is a wild card between the traditionally leftist French nationalists and the tradictionally liberal Anglo factions. But with the kikes going full retard and tring to flood the place, the French might just go nationalist and try to burn the place down. Which will wake up the Anglos. If the jews are smart, at that point they'll try to stoke ethnic conflict and side with the Anglos against the French. But will White peoples fall for this shit again?
I doubt it. I really do doubt it.

I think this time the old brother war D&C will backfire. I think that this time it will be quite obvious which (((people))) are clamoring for more blood.

civil war and balkanization is a jew meme

The left can maintain order in its ranks by focusing their hatred against whites. As long as whites are alive the left has a target to focus things.


Sure.

It's not just whites and "the left". Hispanics and blacks don't like each other. There are many groups that will be involved, and cities have representation by all of them.

You're thinking of the Nipigon River bridge.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nipigon_River_Bridge


Quebec will be a US state, mark my words. Newfoundland will join too, as will the rest of the Atlantic provinces will merge together, possibly with Maine, or on their own as Acadia.

IPFS link: /ipfs/zDMZof1m5F5usCdoVzydQDje6AbEYbqesWNznzL4pdCkC96ZduCJ

I think if we had another civil war it certainly won't be a standing army that's clear cut like that ever again, it'll be Americans versus those that want to destroy America.
Quite a bit of those that can actually fight will already be behind "enemy lines" it will more than likely be guerrilla, with a lot of decentralized conflicts, some of which may rally into larger ones.
I'm thinking a government response toward symbolic happenings will push this nation into a full on civil war.

True, I drove through it a couple times, and there's nothing there. As it is, the roads are barely maintained. Appreciate the post.

Neat maps, they look sorta familiar.

Friendly reminder that communists would like to grab power out of the chaos from a civil or race war.

There aren't enough of (((them))) to have a chance at winning a fight, that's why they've chosen the culture and demographic war. Flood the country with foreigners, push race mixing and forced diversity, destroy religion and the family, take over media and education, grab guns, etc..

Attached: soviet america.png (1064x769, 305.12K)

So? It's like they don't have competition.

*not like

So, because there's competition, that makes it ok that commies are trying to wreck the country?

Attached: alex_jones_eyeballin.gif (171x172, 961.68K)

There's no substance to saying that "commies want power". It doesn't mean they'll get it. If you'd said explicitly how they're more likely to get power than someone else then discussion could take place. Instead we're in captain obvious land.

How do you quantify that? If they're pushing for a civil or race war (and have been for a long time), and you're going along with that, would that put them ahead?

Do you have a point to make? Nobody said anything about "going along" with a civil war. What's your purpose here?

Just that, generally speaking, it's the communists that want and would benefit (try to) from civil war, and have been planning it for longer than 20 years. It is within the topic of the thread, "Civil war general", imo.

Ok, I think I see the disconnect in our views.
The book in the OP was written over 20 years ago, and argues that civil war 2 is not in the planning stage, but already under way. I take it you think it's not basically an inevitability at this point that ethnic factions in the US are going to clash militarily. What do you see as our way out? I certainly don't want a civil war, but force is going to be necessary, and every side has the means to use it.

Western Canada is pure untapped resource. The rural folk would probably remove vancouverites due to how bad they've fucked everything considering BC was run by right wing people until demographics changed.

Attached: ben.jpg (500x624, 51.28K)

It seems reasonable to try and avoid that, if possible. Roll back the changes made by the communists/socialists/globalists over the years. e.g. Remove the Mexicans. Stop or severely limit immigration. Rebuild the industries we gave away to China and others with their import deals and policies and taxes that made companies leave the country, all of which are gutting the middle class. Remove the communists' diversity agenda and corruption from congress and agencies like the FBI, fix media and education, etc.. Trump has started doing some of that, and there are more 'local' or state and county level things to deal with…

More thought is obviously needed and I would say that rolling back the changes would probably have to have force backing it up, given how entrenched the cultural marxism is (and the Mexicans), for example, but it's all just guesswork at this point. Do we try rolling it all back or just start shooting? It doesn't seem like there's been a concerted effort to fix the issues at this point. Trump getting elected was a good first step.

The thing is, "rolling things back" is a nice way of saying "force". And first we have to wrestle control of that force away from (((them))). With demographics the way they are, I don't believe in a smooth transition, but certainly we need to try.

Attached: knots.jpg (787x964, 196.53K)

"remove the mexicans" … how can you do this without force you idiot

"accidents"

"I deliver a hard day's work for my money. I just want the chance. It'll come. I believe in America. I follow the rules. Everybody's got their own hard times these days."

Attached: space_jew.jpg (1000x563, 76.16K)

How would whites even hold all of this territory in the first pic? That's only realistic if:

-"who want to attack you" … yea we can
-bring them , they will attack us while we defend or slowly chip away at us while we remain "docile"
-"enough young people to fight and win" … i really dont even know what you are talking about


our industry/tech is enough to stop any threat , our land is enough for us to not have to rely on outside help to survive (good crops)

we have enough nukes to wipe our ass with … how dumb are you mate? We lose everyone loses

The answer is in the book. It has to do with the demographics along and behind those lines. It's an old picture though.

At least attempt to post in accordance to how this place works.

No, you really can't. At least not immediately. You'd have lots of porous areas just ripe to sneak through.

Slowly chipping away at you is the problem. It's not a war of attrition you'd be dealing with; every person you lose is harder to replace than there's. Every inch of land you cede is a tightening of the noose in regards to physical space and resources you hold.

You need long people for any long term sustainability - something whites in every country don't have. And to add to this you have fewer white people with every passing hour as more die off with Boomers (who are virtually useless for any sort of fighting as it is) making up a huge chunk of the population (and this even assumes that Boomers are all on your side anyway which isn't the case).

But will you actually use it?

Assuming you don't face any unforeseen roadblocks like outside manipulation/bio-warfare, natural droughts, etc.

Not dumb enough to nuke land right god damned next to me that I've theoretically given away and wish to reclaim and have it be anything other than a place to get instant brain cancer.

Bingo.

I know you and the other user have begun your own battle of hypotheticals, but that picture is from the book, and depicts not an end point, but the formation of where the front lines of civil war 2 would be drawn based on the racial makeup, and geographic layout of the country. Basically, that ground has already been ceded.

Ah yes. Thanks user.


Alaska may do okay in a civil war despite being effectively cut off from the world. But the same will not be true for Vancouver. Vancouver will not do well because they are not homogeneous. You cannot survive as a city when you are not homogeneous. Worse yet for them, their back is not secure. Right wingers surround the city. No food by way of land if things break down. Worse yet, the only two highways that lead to the city run through Seattle and the other through that bridge points out. Who would run that gauntlet? I wouldn't. Worse still the city is run by limp wristed liberals. Honestly I said that the Asians were probably not going to start rioting, but now that I think about it, liberals mismanage things to such an extent that I wouldn't be surprised if the liberals themselves rioted. And if they did, what if they unintentionally attacked the Asian businesses? Just on the outskirts of Asian city blocks and by mistake. This would be enough to compel the Asians to defend their city blocjs Serajevo style. And what then?
You might see liberals go racial fast.

I mean, it's go racial or starve.

Oh please.
In theory you are correct but in practice you are not. We are in a bad place, but at least White racialists have support bases with millions of supported around the country. IN America alone we have support bases in Cascadia, the midwest, the south, and even pockets in the east. Not even mentioning our millions of steely eyed lone wolfer types unconnected with anyone who support us via the alt-right and other nationalist movements, parties, and ideologies. We have White militias that are as well armed as any police force. And the police themselves are riddled with pro-Whites as individuals and even in coordinating networks.
What do the communists have?
They have basically no support outside of limp wristed liberal college students, who are more concerned with liberalism than communism which is just a fad to them. They have no real support bases anywhere in America. Rural areas despise and scorn them. So even if they did have militias, where would they operate? Liberals will run the cities and neocons, conservatives, and White racialists will run the countryside. So where will they run? Nothing and nowhere.
Speaking of militias, they have none.
Oh sure, they have the john brown shooting club. But that's not a real militia. That's a get together of communists once a month or so to pretend to be revolutionaries and pretend to know how to use guns.

There are communists in the world that know how to fight and use guns and are organized and have support from the countryside. They're in Asia. They're in Africa. But cry as they might, it's just not the case here. And ironically, those "communists" in Asia aren't even communists anyway. They're civic nationalists who want ethno-states. Vietnam for the Vietnamese. A state for the Santal people. Laos for the Laotian people. Etcetera. A bit of a tangent but White communists are fucking morons. They support civic-nationalism when it pretends to be communism because communists are more concerned with wordism than reality.
Anyway, my point is that communists have no fucking chance of achieving anything other than empowering a right wing dictatorship if things collapse. They have no support, no organization, no paramilitary groups, and no goals really.

Attached: hqdefaultHVIBQ3Q9.jpg (480x360, 8.34K)

Oh my fucking god. Our glorious, genius, brilliant Darlings have decided to filter the word "e t h n o" now.
This is a great idea and I love our glorious, genius Darlings. Praise the Darlings.
Thankyou Darlings for once again preventing us from having intelligent conversations. Who needs words after all?
Praise the Darlings and all their glorious work for the White race. The Darlings are the greatest heroes ever to grace our race.

Darlings are fags

Communism outside of Western Europe has always been nationalism covered in buzzwords and commie aesthetics.

ethno

Indeed. This is why the ETA get to claim to be Marxists. For crying out loud, they're e t h n o nationalists. There's nothing classist about them. It's all racial.

I'm not opposed to using force against people who are trying to destroy the country. They are certainly worthy of it. But if you can, for example, have a wall, a deportation policy that is permanent (like virtually every other country has) as opposed to catch and release, penalties against those who hire/harbor, then force -might- not be needed on a large scale.

Yeah, I get it, what are you doing about it though. What's your plan?

Are you not familiar with the jewish bolshevik revolution in Russia? They didn't have large armies or militia, yet they took over the entire country, many of their neighboring countries, and murdered unprecedented millions. You'd have to be blind to not see the progress communists have made in this country. Central fiat currency bank, income taxes, property taxes, socialist education/media, socialist policies (not to mention things like Obama care), demographic displacement, actual communists in the white house and running for president every 4 years, etc..

Attached: bernie.jpg (480x366, 24.54K)

Nigger, you really need to learn some basic Russian history.
Here is the short of the so called revolution

After years of war, elements in the Russian military seized control of the government (and the Czar) and declared a socialist republic. Unfortunately for the Russians, large elements of the Russian military were sympathetic to communist ideas and entire units switches sides and joined the marxist filth. Look up the fucking Red Guard.
Without the assistance from elements within the army and paramilitary organizations that already existed and had existed for years, the marxists would never have seized control. This is not even taking into account the jews who helped the marxists for their own reasons.
Seriously, you need to study the Russian civil war before you speak from ignorance.
What did you think happened in 1918? A spontanious uprising of the "proletariat" as the marxists claim?

Oh please. Who let this boomer in from Info Wars?
Obama was no communist. Obama was just an empty tool. You think that the kikes in charge have any ideology other than judaism? They are not communists or capitalists or liberals or even neo-cons. They're jews and the only thing they're interested in is advancing zionism. If they could expand Israel by one square inch if they slaughtered 100,000 of their idiot marxist tools in antifa, they'd do it without even the smallest regret.

The only thing that marxists are useful for at all these days is throwing at White people who dare fight against the Zionist system. The communist morons don't even realize that they are helping advance Zionism.
And some understand it and don't even care. They just hate White people so fucking much that they don't give a damn.
But beyond that, they have no organization, no paramilitarty groups, no support from anyone, anywhere, and no hope of seizing more than the art departments of their local universities in the event of a collapse.
Go research the Russian civil war of which you tried to use as an example. Research the communist paramilitary organizations that existed before, during and after the October revolution.

You know, I don't compliment marxist filth very often, but I must hand it to them. They did a very good job at organizing. Yes, they had a lot of help from the synagogues and if any marxists happen to read this, you ought to research the key role in organizing your little revolution the synagogues played but much of their paramilitary organization were Russians. The refuse and rabble of society, but still, they were organized and powerful. I look at that time with envy actually. If we only were half as well organized and had only half as many sympathizers in the government and military, we'd have crushed the Zionist vermin like bugs. It would be a glorious few weeks of bloody vengeance against the heinous crimes the jews have committed against Europeans and against all the people of the entire world.

But oh well. What can ya do. Life dealt us this situation. Now we must figure out how to fix it.

Oh and one more thing. You should look up what happened to some of the most loyal communist followers after they were no longer needed. Look up what happened to the true communist believers at the Kronstadt naval base. That's the reward for all Marxist filth from their own leaders.

Attached: qatar.gif (359x360, 1.61M)

What's a good book or documentary on Russia?

In my opinion, the best book to start off with is Alexandre Soljenitsyne's "200 Years Together"
It's actually a pretty daunting book or 2 part series. But it's worth it because it deals with the jewish question in a way that is so detailed and so well researched that it is a true masterpiece. It also is infuriating, as most great works of history are. God, the fucking jews had every opportunity to do good. They were given every advantage and every incentive to stop exploiting the Russian people and live like human beings, but they chose to be jews. It's less well known than The Gulag Archipelago but it's very, very interesting.

Most other books shy away from naming the jew.
However there was obviously more to the conflict than the jews and it's important to understand what causes the breakdown of a state.
A long time ago I read a really great book called "The Ghite Generals" by Richard Luckett. This book really explores the mindsets and problems of the anti-communist forces and explains why the communists won. It details a lot of the paramilitary organizations the marxists had as well as the lack of effective leadership, coordination, and unity among the opposition. In addition, it touches upon the entrenched marxist sympathizers in the army. Many of the anti-communist leaders were socialists themselves.

I'd recommend Evan Mawdsley's "Russian civil War". It's alright for its size. I hear that marxists hate it for some reason and it is pretty good. But it's kind of general and glosses over important details and focuses more on military campaigns. Some people like that. I don't.

But by far the most informative book on the subject is Richard Pipe's "Russian Revolution" which is everything you could ask for short of the JQ, which obviously must be left out or you'll never get published. But you can put two and two together.
It's great because he really deals with the precursors to the breakdown and THIS is what is important for everyone to understand. The only drawback is that it's a bit, um… long. It's kind of like a dictionary and best read like one. Not all at once. Instead I read the early parts (which start in the 1800s) and take a break to absorb the information. And then get on to the military conflict which is also very interesting.

WHITE generals. I meant White generals, by Richard Luckett. Gods, how did that happen?
Anyway, I recommend anything that deals with the antebellum and don't care for authors that obsess over battles. Battles are interesting. But battles are just results. Understanding chemistry is much more interesting than the reactions themselves.

You really devour information. I'll have to add one of those to my reading schedule. Don't know if anyone actually listens to my readings, but the act of reading aloud helps me to better comprehend, and remember.

I agree with you on the battle history. It's mildly interesting, but really dry out of context of the characters involved. Started "Alexander" by Theodore Ayrault Dodge last year, and I'm about a third of the way through. Whereas "Hitler's War" downright fun for the month it lasted me.

Thanks for the books.

Deepwater ports - mandatory according to peoples experience in Rhodesia. You need to be able to trade.

did he lose weight?

Attached: Study- Leftist men are weak.webm (854x480, 6.28M)

No idea. I think it's an old one. I guess he always planned on being the communist leader. One lone fat man leading a sea of starving proletariats. Gommunism.


Thanks, user. This just happens to be my favorite subject. Any time someone starts a revolutions or civil war or coup d'etat thread, I live here until a new one pops up.
I know of Dodge. I began (but never finished unfortunately) his Hannibal Barca book back when I was obsessed with the Punic Wars. Good author. Very wordy.

I read about Dodge before getting his book, and he sounded like someone worth learning from. He fought in the American Civil War, losing his leg (I think) in battle, but didn't come out of his experiences with an ant-war attitude. Instead he has more appreciation for the glory of battle. He seems like a real man. It was also a good sign that of the negative reviews I read of his books people were complaining that he was racist (he thought particularly little of asians, and their battle strategies, or lack of).

There was a single time in public school that I actually enjoyed being there, and that was when we were learning about the American Civil War. I ended up watching the Ken Burns documentary, and the Ghettysburg film with all the shitty fake beards (Gods and Generals hadn't come out yet) on my own time because I was so into the subject. Goes to show there was always a deep desire in me for the world to radically change from the status quo. There may also just be a warrior-like urge to fight for something righteous.

Attached: booby trap locations.gif (728x709, 58.99K)

I hate having to repeat myself.

Any exclusively White part of America strong enough to enforce its White exclusivity, is strong enough to conquer and take the entire thing. There would never be any breakup. Only revolution or extinction.

Speaking of repeating oneself, that picture is not a representation 3 new nations at peace with each other, it's a mock up the frontlines of battle during Civil War 2. It's from the book in the OP.

If the battlelines were that clean, we woupdnt be having these problems.

Of course there's pockets of conflict all over every territory, but the point of the picture was to depict where in general you don't want to be when the breaking point happens. Enclaves of any group are fucked if they're behind enemy lines. Check out the book, it's good.

Great post, OP.

Couple points to add:

First, it's important to consider who has control of the planes, ships, and bases/launch sites that can administer nukes. It is imperative that /ourguys/ are in control.

Second, with the nuke factor in mind, time seems to be a factor, because there will probably not be another friendly face in the White House for a while after Trump is gone and may never be again. Once we have an unsympathetic administration, we are no more than a few years away, tops, from total authoritarian govt/surveillance state totalitarianism as well as white genocide.

I'm not a wealth of detailed information myself, but nukes remain a fear for all sides regardless of their control of them. The mere use of nukes has such a stigma that I don't think anyone could nuke anyone with pissing off more people within and without their faction. I don't foresee much nuking, or much success as a result of it. Certainly interested in hearing more thoughts on it, though.

As you say, though, true conflict appears imminent unless something miraculously changes our course. Gotta be prepared. Know how survive away from any place worth nuking.

Attached: molotov cocktail.png (1500x694 53.29 KB, 230.99K)

Here is a map I made a while ago based on county level demographic statistics. I overlaid the map onto a map of highways and cities for strategic analysis.
Please note that many of the areas in the east that I awarded to blacks are also populated by mestizos (in their own pockets). Thus there will be much infighting. However given that blacks constitute a majority in most of these areas and considering that the blacks have more contiguous potential territory, I figure they just be more likely to win out against them. Ceteris Paribus, of course.


Loved that movie.
I too have a penchant for artillery fire and a fascination with civil wars. They're the most brutal of conflicts and each one is unique like a snowflake.

Attached: War scenario worst case.png (3966x2110, 6.5M)

Shitty map. The whole of Mexico is mestizo, very few pure amerindians remain today. Maya territory begins only in the southern mountaineous regions like Oaxaca.

But Oaxaca isn't even on the fucking map, retard.

And very few people live in that territory.

sage

CONFEDERATES = ROTHSCHILDS

The Jews ran the slave trade and wanted to break up the Union to install a Central Bank. Lincoln wanted Greenbacks. The Secretary of the Tresury for the Confeds was a Jew who would of been the first Vice President if they won, but they lost so he ran to London and took all the money under the Rothschilds.


Get your meme flag out of here Rothschild

Attached: 10806_486031241465360_1085469529_n.jpg (627x735, 73.73K)