Oh goodness! A woman with a garrote! How TERRIFYING!
Translation: “I’ve figured out how to monetize the confused goyim” How feminine.
>And the upside to his notoriety is obvious: Mr. Peterson is now arguably the most famous public intellectual in Canada, and his book “12 Rules for Life” is a best-seller. How organic!
>The exile of Bret Weinstein and Ms. Heying from Evergreen State brought them to the attention of a national audience that might have come for the controversy but has stayed for their fascinating insights about subjects including evolution and gender.
>“I’ve been at this for 25 years now, having done all the MSM shows, including Oprah, Charlie Rose, ‘The Colbert Report,’ Larry King — you name it,” Michael Shermer, the publisher of Skeptic magazine, told me. >“The last couple of years I’ve shifted to doing shows hosted by Joe Rogan, Dave Rubin, Sam Harris and others. The I.D.W. is as powerful a media as any I’ve encountered.” Its almost like you're setting up a new MSM…
Things That Never Happened.
Ryan White
Oh no, really? >This probably helps explain why some people in this group talk constantly about the regressive left but far less about the threat from the right. Yeah, that's it. Its not that they're a Jewish movement to control the upswell of Nationalism on the right by coopting it. Not at all.
>“There are a few people in this network who have gone without saying anything critical about Trump, a person who has assaulted truth more than anyone in human history,” Mr. Harris said. What's 'quite strange' is the statement that Trump has assaulted more truth than anyone in human history, Mr. Atheist Kike.
>Emphasis is one problem. Associating with genuinely bad people is another. This is so fucking obvious…
>Go a click in one direction and the group is enhanced by intellectuals with tony affiliations like Steven Pinker at Harvard. Both Jews. Its almost like they're stationing themselves on all sides of this thing… >and conspiracy theorists like Mike Cernovich (the #PizzaGate huckster) and Alex Jones (the Sandy Hook shooting denier).
>It’s hard to draw boundaries around an amorphous network, especially when each person in it has a different idea of who is beyond the pale. They don't though.
>“If this thing becomes something massive — a political or social movement — then maybe we’d need to have some statement of principles. For now, we’re just a crew of people trying to have the kind of important conversations that the mainstream won’t.” Aw, isn't that nice.
>But is a statement of principles necessary to make a judgment call about people like Mr. Cernovich, Mr. Molyneux and Mr. Yiannopoulos? Oy vey! >Mr. Rogan regularly lets Abby Martin — a former 9/11 Truther who is strangely sympathetic to the regimes in Syria and Venezuela — rant on his podcast. Hah, yeah, how 'strange'. >He also encouraged Mr. Jones to spout off about the moon landing being fake during Mr. Jones’s nearly four-hour appearance on his show. Again demonstrating that Rogan belongs in this group as a mouthpiece only, his platform being useful, his mind being bong resin.
Translation: I'm happy to let him exist so long as I can parasitize off his viewerbase.
Nicholas Gomez
>But with a figure like Mr. Cernovich, who can occasionally sound reasonable, how is a viewer supposed to know better?
Yet they regularly do it.
You mean like Jewish media outlets have been doing for 30 years? >“Once I.D.W. folks saw that people like Ben Shapiro were generally smart, highly informed and often princely in difficult conversations, it’s more understandable that occasionally a few frogs got kissed here and there as some I.D.W. members went in search of other maligned princes.” Amazing how many of those 'maligned princes' were Jewish moderates.
>But people who pride themselves on pursuing the truth and telling it plainly should be capable of applying these labels when they’re deserved. >It seems to me that if you are willing to sit across from an Alex Jones or Mike Cernovich and take him seriously, there’s a high probability that you’re either cynical or stupid. I'd say the same about… Every single person named as associated with this shit. >If there’s a reason for shorting the I.D.W., it’s the inability of certain members to see this as a fatal error.
Carter Butler
Translation: In recent days, the Jews have set up this crew to oppose Nationalism and, to give them some credentials with the people they're trying to court away from Nationalism, malign them in certain Jewish outlets.
>That isn’t true. >The group excoriated Mr. Harris, a fierce critic of the treatment of women and gays under radical Religion of Cuck™, for saying that “some percentage, however small” of Muslim immigrants are radicalized. You mean, like, the vast majority of Muslims worldwide? wat
Which they shouold. Which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Kayden Lewis
>Bret Weinstein subtweeted his criticism of these choices: “Smart, skeptical people are often surprisingly susceptible to being conned if a ruse is tailored to their prejudices.” So, what you're saying is, most of them addressed it, often directly in media, almost as though it was all coordinated?
>So when he tweets “only freethinkers” and “It’s no more barring people because they have different ideas,” he is picking up on a real phenomenon: that the boundaries of public discourse have become so proscribed as to make impossible frank discussions of anything remotely controversial. Who created that context? Oh, the same (((Tribe))) being shilled now as the solution to it… How strange.
Hmmmm.
Wyatt Brown
why do they even bother with this bullshit
Nolan Bennett
>Am (((I))) a member of this movement? A few months ago, someone suggested on Twitter that I should join this club I’d never heard of. >I looked into it. Like many in this group, I am a classical liberal who has run afoul of the left, often for voicing my convictions and sometimes simply by accident. Translation: You're a Jew who sometimes gets bitched at by muds and especially leftist Jews. Translation: This has won me praise from lolbergs and cuckservatives, probably most of them Jewish. >And having been attacked by the left, I know I run the risk of focusing inordinately on its excesses — and providing succor to some people whom I deeply oppose. Funny, that. But not too much, right? >I don’t, however, want to live in a culture where there are no gatekeepers at all. Hah, yeah, okay. >Given how influential this group is becoming, I can’t be alone in hoping the I.D.W. finds a way to eschew the cranks, grifters and bigots and sticks to the truth-seeking. Could you cup their balls just a bit more?
Most of them are Jewish. Then again, so is most of (((IDW))). So sayeth the Marxist.
Bentley Gray
What you're seeing here is the same sort of co-option, diluiton and manipulation of opposition that the kikes have pulled half a dozen times over the decades already. They push too far, and when the ressentiment begins to boil over they quickly create alternatives that seem to oppose the bleeding edge of their ideological advance, while in truth embracing all its previous achieviements. They serve as an outlet, as an alternative, as an illusion of a hope for reversal - but in reality they're just there to create the mirage of dissent while the next generation of two grow up with all of the previous achievements already deeply ingrained in their psyche. Rinse and repeat.
They're exceedingly good at this. There is no real counter to this strategy, either, at least not within the confines of "civil discourse" since they control the window of socially acceptable debate. Anons think the bongs imprisoning some alt lite faggot or a literal commie comedian is some grave overreach, when in reality it is just a deliberate operation to create plausible martyrs. Nothing gives a dissident street cred like government persecution - and the wannabe dissidents, wannabe free thinkers eat this shit up, unaware that they're being played like a fucking fiddle.
The unofficial official term is a "release valve".
David Baker
Its pretty obvious, no? They see right-wing politics being subsumed by Nationalism, and they're getting scared shitless by it. So, they concocted this mess, to give people an alternative - instead of being bad goys, you can still be good goyim and have an 'edgy' political movement to associate with.
They basically stuck their noses between cuckservatism and what has been called 'the alt-right' and made a new position that people can hold if they aren't cucked enough to be cuckservatives and aren't edgy enough to be alt-right.
(((Sam Harris))) – Secular Jew (((Eric Weinstein))) – Israel-educated California-borne Jew, brother of (((Bret Weinstein))) Jordan Peterson – Individualist Canadian Shabbos (((Dave Rubin))) – Gay Jew (((Ben Shapiro))) – Stereotypical Badger Jew (((Douglas Murray))) – British Jew Maajid Nawaz – British Pakistani ‘Secular Religion of Cuck™ist’, married to a degenerate “race is a social construct” modern-artist White woman from Tennessee Ayaan Hirsi Ali – Literal Africa-nigger married to Brit Niall Ferguson, who wrote a glowing history of the Rothschilds (possibly a British Jew) (((Christina Hoff Sommers))) – Liberal Jewish Feminist Joe Rogan – Stoned Meathead Shabbos Charlie Kirk – Homosexuality-Promoting Zionist Shabbos (((Claire Lehmann))) – Australian Anti-Tribalism Jew Debrah Soh – Homosexuality-Promoting Asian Feminist, writes for Playboy (((Michael Shermer))) – Christian-Convert ‘Skeptic’ ‘I Am Not Jewish’ Jew (((Steven Pinker))) – Romanian/Polish Male-Feminist Atheist Jew
