Patrick Little Claims

I didn't say that, I said he was a plant. He's not very eloquent and his arguments are not things he has come to personally - you can tell he is trying to recall things, rather than speak his mind. His debate with Halsey was atrocious.

At best the guy wakes a few people up - at worst he says something retarded and makes it an even bigger fucking deal with the leftists.

Or have an actual debate with Ryan Dawson

Aren't (You) cute.

Attached: gnocchi_laugh.webm (640x480, 3.27M)

WHAT'S UP WHITEBOIS

Attached: 1526549803626.jpg (800x533, 84.4K)

Having a Jewish spouse is significant in many ways but it doesn't mean you can just include them as part of Jewish over-representation. Unless they've converted they're still ethnically and religiously non-Jewish. Claiming they're spiritually Jewish doesn't make sense either, because everyone in those positions is.
The more honest position of counting only genuine Jews and ending up with 1650% or whatever it would be would still be staggering without being a blatant misrepresentation.

Look at what an attention-seeker uncle Adolf was.

Attached: NurembergRally.jpg (580x460, 67.95K)

I can agree that the 1650% or whatever figure is enough, so for strategic reasons, to avoid accusations of inaccuracy, we might prefer that approach.

However, you're underplaying the significance of the Jewish spouses. The vast majority of Wall Street executives are male. So the Jewish spouses are wives, which means the children of the pairing are 100% Jewish under Jewish law. Any man that marries a Jew effectively ties his genetic legacy to the Jews. And isn't that what it's all about for all of us - out children's futures?

I agree about the significance of a Jewish spouse, and that it merges the goy's line into that of the Jews, but it's simply untrue that marrying a Jew makes you Jewish - unless you convert, which they evidently haven't as otherwise they'd be Jews instead of merely their spouses.
You could make it fair by saying that 2% of the pop is Jews, and 1% (or whatever) are non-Jews married to Jews, and do the overrepresentation mathematics from there, specifying that it's Jewish or Jewish spousal overrepresentation. Otherwise it's inaccurate and the figures are incorrect, as the spouses of Jews don't figure into that 2% pop figure, yet they do figure into the overrepresentation.

Except this part: to marry a kike you have to convert to the heeb religion and go worship Satan in a dirty synagogue.

Stop embarrassing yourself.