Read Evola

Pic related. Next time you'll do the job yourself. He attacked specifically the christian religion, with the "personal god of theism".
But whatever, this
is the most retarded of retardation anyone can say. You didn't even said anything against what I said regarding Guenon and his wish of western tradition (through christianity) regenerating with the help of islam/hinduism, and the Evola's stand.
Twerks the fact as much as you want.

Attached: quote-religion.png (1920x1200, 387.14K)

You don't seem to understand English very well. My statement was that Evola is closer to Orthodox, which is true. And this makes him more traditional than guenon, contrary to what guenon acolytes think.

And, as I thought, this page does not say what you believe it says, since he is talking about the western scholastic Christianity.

And again, I am not saying that evola was a Christian or that his doctrine is orthodox. Just that his philosophy and conception of metaphysics was closer to orthodoxy than Guenon's was.

"personal god of theism"
"personal god of theism"
"personal god of theism"
"personal god of theism"
"personal god of theism"
"personal god of theism"

exoterism =/= esoterism
You don't know anything bout scholastic to say such things.

You're just deaf. They are at kilometers from christian orthodoxy. Justify your believe as much as you want. The position of Evola is clear: he don't have anything against polytheism.

Precision: he don't support the fact that the god of the exoteric religion is unique, and certainly not a man.

I think you may be retarded.

That's what he said in an interview, but in french. But again, I'm talking about the exoteric tradition of christian orthodoxy. My point is that he's a kilometers of that.
Moreover, saying that Evola is more traditional than Guenon is simply false.

It was the lumpenproles who supported Bonapart, an Augstan counterrevolutionary in the same vein as Hitler, who fought against the same forces and restored his country…for a time.
Lumpenproles serve an important function.
So do aristocrats. Evola is not wrong.

However, given their long history of landownership, the rural appalachians are far more likely to be the aristocrats than any urbanite.

...

It's not the Western views in entirety he's attacking. He's criticizing the Abrahamic religions. You're not very well-read on this topic. Evola was fascinated by the Roman Empire and its aristocratic and hierarchical system of government. He viewed the Abrahamic religions as morality independent of the state. He isn't wrong either. Institutions such as the Catholic Church promote liberal democracy as the only legitimate system of government. If you want to water down his arguments, its that the Holy See is associated with liberal democracy, and Roman tradition associated with fascism. Evola is best described as a traditionalist, not a nihilist.

You jews seem deficient at abstract thought.

Sounds pretty euphoric to me.