That IQ stuff? That needs an overhaul in thinking anyway.
IQ only matters if it's below 100 because that really impedes general fitness. Over 100 only one thing matters, skills in agriculture and animal husbandry as well as environmental care, because being able to eat, drink and breathe is the currency with which "other disciplines" are fueled and bought with.
So let's say you have like a maths IQ of 200, doesn't do you much if you breathe toxic air, drink toxic water and are starving.
Coincicentally, "whites" excel in all those super important fields, and, as a bonus, they are actually really really really really good at everything else, too. In fact, whites are usually the best in understanding and implementing and pioneering tech and science that others can use it too.
And the funny thing is. This is the ultimate argument, it has the least holes and the most weight.
Caleb Nguyen
Stop with the marxist bullshit. A nog could just as well say "IQ only matters if it's below 70 because that really impedes general fitness". You immediately contradict your own idiocy by pointing out that whites are the best at things which require a high IQ, and that above 100 IQ whites implement technology to improve the lives of below 100 IQ whites.
Parker Gomez
The Flynn Effect is in specific domain intelligences while the IQ gap between groups tends to be in g, thus not overlapping on one another. As James Flynn said: "The results appear to me correct: the magnitude of white/black IQ differences on Wechsler subtests at any given time is correlated with the g loadings of the subtests; the magnitude of IQ gains over time on subtests is not usually so correlated; the causes of the two phenomena are not the same. I have acknowledged this many times." (Flynn, 2008, p. 79; 2012, p.136). But whatever, for the sake of argument, let's say they overlap: you can still have a giant effect on IQ and g by the Flynn Effect with group differences still being heritable, , because, hey, heritability is talking about the variance between groups due to genetic variances. Thus, what you should look at is the variance between groups on the Flynn Effect and not the Flynn Effect itself. Also, when factoring for environment, the Flynn Effect would be defacto factored for this it's environment.
After all, they're currently dying of starvation in niggerland.
When I say that what I said is the ultimate argument, then I mean it, and I am right about it, too.
Hunter Anderson
A) you need to provide a source
B) you have to be a fucking retard to have kids with a negress when as a white man you’re at the top of the reproduction hierarchy. Women are terrible at saying no and give in to (((society’s))) pressures. A woman would rather throw her entire lineage in the trash to avoid being called a racist and trust me niggers play that angle .00025 seconds after being rejected. The only cure is to remove niggers from white society.
Owen Carter
100 is just average. The average by white standards that is, needed to maintain a civilized society at our level. High IQ people are crucial for top level tasks. Even if a high IQ is not a 100% guarantee of success individually (it doesn't measure work ethic or creativity, for instance), it's the best way to measure a society's success (unless it's squandered by shit systems such as communism).
Jaxon Jones
Do you even know what selection bias is? Because you didn't respond to this Blount at all. Lookup first. For example, black father's may need to be much smarter than the average black male to be able to acquire a white wife, because white women require higher standards and income. One example of selection bias.
