Speaking to SJWs

that's about how i've always thought about it. i don't really give a shit about the individual sjw and know that they are probably beyond redemption but you give them just enough rope to hang themselves in front of the people listening.

Absolutely this. The purpose of public debate with the SJW is to sway the audience.

Their biggest fear I have found is experiencing the exact thing they claim victimhood status for yet lie about receiving. The biggest way to do this is exposure through pol. They fucking fear pol like no other. It is the absolute bane to their existence as they can't accuse pol of their typical identity politics shit and even if they did they know anons wouldn't give a fuck. So the best way to "convince" them into something is systematic beatdown exposure to the point where they feel their only option to hide is to shut the fuck up and jump ship from the stance that caused them so much crap. Identify, expose background/fuck ups, doxx, spread, they will slink away and never return. I mean seriously how many have we shut down just by that? Countless.

There is no way to convince an SJW in private unless they become the victim of the thing they are standing for. For example, if a dindu or illegal attacks them or a mudslime blows up their city and kills their family. Then you can get the gears turning slowly, but even so it may not happen

In public, you need to convince the audience and essentially have them discredited. Argue using logic, never raise your voice, point out fallacies and false equivalency where they are and stick to the topic.

What we should do is call them for what they are - CONTROL FREAKS.
They cannot escape form that, because it's true. They always want to control everything.

Trigger them so they look like the fools they are to the lemmings. Essentially look at them with either disdain, slight confusion or mild amusement while framing their views as inferior and against the group.

This.
That's why you point out their hatred of White people.
That's why you accuse them of supporting genocide.
They do support the ongoing genocide of White people after all.
Asking them where they see White people in 50 years or 100 years can be useful sometime.
Point out that the US was 90% White 60 years ago, but is barely 60% now.
Then ask them again.
Point out that the word for that is "genocide."
Ask them if they support the ethnic cleansing of Africa, India, and SE Asia when tens of millions of Whites were physically removed from non-White countries as part of "decolonization." Point out the hypocrisy of opposing Whites invading non-White countries while supporting non-Whites invading White countries.
Point out that diversity is genocide.
Stress the fact that White people exist.
Stress the fact that White people being "replaced" or mixed out of existence is genocide.
Point out that they support genocide.
Point out that genocide is wrong.
Point out that people who support genocide are BAD PEOPLE.

Some ideas, anyway.
Remember:
WE have the moral high ground.
WE are the "good guys."
Wanting your people to have a future is not wrong.
Wanting your people to have a homeland is not wrong.
Wanting your people to have a government of your people, by your people, and for your people is not wrong.
Wanting your people to EXIST is not wrong.
Opposing White genocide IS NOT WRONG.
It is RIGHT.

This

Why would you speak with non-humans? They are incapable of thinking independently.

As many have mentioned knock them off their false altruism pedestal, let them know their methods are evil and not virtuous.
The remaining ones that embrace being foul disgusting people will be cast aside until dealt with in the future, those are a waste of time and they deserve to be excluded.

I can tell you from experience it's pretty much a giant waste of time, even if you're trying to convince them of something that's in their own best interest.