With numbers such as these...

It is. The concept of "self ownership" assumes an absoluteness of free will and "self" that doesn't exist.

So what’s the ideological opposite of a solipsist? This should be good. Explain how you can know ONLY that ‘self’ doesn’t exist.

Both Conservativism and Libertarianism are forms of Liberalism, the belief that the individual is more important than the group. With that presupposition, you have no real arguments against feminism and globalism etc. And you have no real argument for nationalism. If you want to call yourself a rightwinger, then you've got a big problem.

Going beyond that, libertarianism, like liberalism, says that the individual is the atom of society. Libertarians argue that there is no obligation whatsoever for a person to feed or clothe his own children.

I didn't say "self" doesn't exist. I said the degree of absoluteness of "self" presumed by lolbertarianism does not exist. A clearer way of saying it is that individuals are secondary to groups. Or that groups are ontologically prior to individuals.

Aha, thanks for clarifying.

MAYBE NOW MURRICANS CAN TRY VOTING FOR A PARTY THAT ISN'T THE REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS, RIGHT?

RIGHT?

Yeah, individualism is absolute cancer. No surprise then that Lolbergturdianism was lagely founded by Jews.

lol

the degree to which that absoluteness exist in someone else doesn't change the degree to which it exist in me.