First of all, lurk moar.
Secondly, anthropogenic forces may or may not be having a significant effect on global warming, but global warming is very real regardless. The climate of the Earth is not fixed. It varies over the years, the most obvious examples are ice ages.
Regardless, global warming is not the real problem right now.
The real problem is pollution. Plastic, mercury, sulfur compounds, various heavy metals, industrial chemicals, and so forth. Also overpopulation (of shitholers) and habitat destruction. Jews are heavily involved.
Toxic shit in the food and water is fucking people up big time. It is also fucking up animals, plants, the ocean, and so forth. It gets worse every year. Also, the vast majority of non-carbon pollution comes from non-White countries. Part of the reason for the push to "internationalize" industry was/ is because shitholes have little if any effective pollution controls.
How ignorant are you?
The southern tip of Florida is about 25 degrees north of the equator.
In other words. the southernmost point of the CONUSA is about 1725 miles north of the equator.
Indeed, ALL of Mexico is also north of the equator.
So, the ice ages didn't happen, then?
You're right about turd world idiocy destroying nature, though.
Read a little about the history of White people.
Especially the many, many wars.
That way everything will have to be plastic, right?
Sustainable forestry is not the problem. IE, how it is done in White countries since Whites aren't retarded.
Now, tree farms are not wilderness. That is what preserved wilderness areas are for.
There is still plenty of room for development of superior fission power plants, but the research is heavily regulated and made very difficult for (((reasons))). Reminder that the anti-nuclear lobby was funded by the coal companies. That would solve electricity which is the largest CO2 producer, number two is motor vehicles IIRC. For that, either electric cars or production of gasoline from carbon feedstock. IE, a variation on coal to oil processes. Instead of coal, use carbon extracted by plants. This could be farm grown. Another possibility is some sort of ocean grown plant material. Even algae, in large enough quantities, should suffice. It should also be possible to directly extract carbon from the air and process that into fuel. Now, all of these processes would require power. Thus, more nuclear power plants. "Muh fukushima!!" Then build the plants better and don't place them anywhere that could, ever, get flooded.
Also, yes, the non-Whites must be forced out of White countries to sink or swim in their own lands. They chose to overpopulate. If they refuse to regulate their numbers, then nature will. They must not be allowed to drag Whites down with them.
They are a walking plague that is infecting White lands.
Crabs in a bucket.
It must be stopped. They must be forced back to their own lands.
You do know that the original "hockey stick graph" was built on heavily cherry picked data, right?
People are lying on both sides. This makes finding the truth difficult.
10 years, 50, even a few hundred is next to nothing on the scale of geological history.
A human life span is a tiny blip in Earth's history.
Also, global warming followed every ice age. Otherwise the ice age would not have ended. That should be obvious.
"Carbon taxes" are an avenue to world government. As in, that is the point. After all, only a world government could oversee such a thing. It would also form a ready made funds source for the fledgling one world government.
That said, preserving a healthy environment for the Volk is extremely important to any real Nationalist.
What happens AFTER the grand solar minimum, then?
I've heard this theory. It's interesting. I wonder where exactly the truth lies.