ANTI-PORN MEGATHREAD

Good, we don't want faggots like you coming here, and we are more than fine with being no-fun. Our fun is smashing the Jew.
Sage for thread derailing.

The problem is not porn itself, its who controls the vast majority of the porn industry. There is plenty of more wholesome porn.

Obviously if you're addicted to pornography and doing it every day that's a problem with severe mental health consequences, but I suspect the only reason Zig Forums hates porn is because for the most part they were autistic kissless virgins at some point and blame pornography for that ("I had no motivation" "porn destroys your testosterone") instead of their inherent unattractiveness.

The idea of a loyal """"based"""" trad waifu is a sentimental fantasy anyways, there was massive prostitution in Europe since the Middle Ages up until the romantic marriage meme gained steam in the late 19th century. Marriage was always business contract before then. Women only took part in it because they had no other choice and it was in the interest of men, monogamy isn't natural in hunter gatherer tribes. Most male animals in nature don't get to mate.

Would you look at that demoralising tel aviv poster.

Attached: Guess_who.png (274x290, 5.39K)

Not seeing any rebuttal here. If you actually read all the research posted by the way, you'd notice that one of major criticisms against porn made here is "muh misogyneeeeee!"

Never argue with a Kike, you both get dirty, and besides the Jew likes it.

You know nothing about nothing and spread defeatism. Don't expect people to take you seriously with garbage posts like

Their marriage code is strict, and no feature of their morality deserves higher praise. They are almost unique among barbarians in being content with one wife apiece – all of them, that is, except a very few who take more than one wife not to satisfy their desires but because their exalted rank brings them many pressing offers of matrimonial alliance. The dowry is brought by husband to wife, not by wife to husband. Parents and kinsmen attend and approve the gifts – not gifts chosen to please a woman's fancy or gaily deck a young bride, but oxen, a horse with its bridle, or a shield, spear and sword. In consideration of such gifts a man gets his wife, and she in her turn brings a present of arms to her husband. This interchange of gifts typifies for them the most sacred bond of union, sanctified by mystic rites under the favor of the presiding deities of wedlock. The woman must not think that she is excluded from aspirations to manly virtues or exempt from the hazards of warfare. That is why she is reminded, in the very ceremonies which bless her marriage at the outset, that she enters her husband's home to be the partner of his toils and perils, that both in peace and war she is to share his sufferings and adventures. That is the meaning of the team of oxen, the horse ready for its rider, and the gift of arms. On these terms she must live her life and bear her children. She is receiving something that she must hand over intact and undepreciated to her children, something for her sons' wives to receive in their turn and pass on to her grandchildren.

Attached: Nixon.jpg (850x400, 47.17K)

It's like I'm really back on halfchan

Attached: IMG_0347.PNG (1280x1004, 184.75K)

You're torpedoeing your own argument right a the beginning

Someone is torpedoing himself, but it's not me.