What part of proving to not be as reliable in matters of zionist interest are you having trouble with?
SAUDI ARABIA POTENTIAL HAPPENING
How the fuck is asking for a citation Jewish?
And what changed in the last few weeks which convinced them of that?
We're both right, you're just refusing to see what triggered it for some reason.
Maybe the fact that the post itself is a citation? It's a link to a citation and a quote from the article. This is like being in the ocean and asking where the water is.
That is not a citation for the collapse of the entire Arab world. Not that we would get one anyway - they'd most likely spring it on us. I don't disagree with you that Saudi is in some hot water - but nothing ever happens, ever.
I'm not refusing to see what triggered it. If Khasshogi is the problem, it's because Khasshogi was important to zionist interests. Not because he was some guy that people knew of, or had some political friends, or a known father, or anything other than his specific connections and utility to the zionist regime of USA/israel. If Khasshogi was not relevant to zionist interests, his death wouldn't matter.
That's not what a didact is. By definition, they're nobodies.
Filtered.
Seems fish to me.
First there was this massive hullabaloo about a Saudi guy who got killed in Turkey and now they send in a Saudi Prince thats been indoctrinated in the UK.
Sounds like the usual manufacture controversy and then take over.
NPCs celebrating this like they did when we went in to Iraw.
This wont work out in our favour. And when it goes tits up you can all say that you read it on Zig Forums first.
Your premise is faulty. Saudi Arabia cannot collapse. It is run by jews and defended by the US army. Reported for spam.