Every headline these days is “TRUMP CLAIMS, WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, OF (fill in the blank)”
So no need to read the article goyim, go back to sleep.
Every headline these days is “TRUMP CLAIMS, WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, OF (fill in the blank)”
So no need to read the article goyim, go back to sleep.
Aren't they pretty much the same things with different facades on them?
Either that or:
No we arent going to tell you who are sources are just trust us you morons
This guy is just doing the same old useful idiot trick of trying to argue that X does not exist.
"X is not real because political authorities of Z haven't acknowledged it's existence, and scholars A, B, & C haven't seen any evidence. Therefore by as a layperson who is totally not trying to push a personal belief I can declare such a thing does not exist, as there is no evidence."
Last part is key, arguments that try to close along the line of there is no evidence could also mean the author did not find any evidence or doesn't meet their own personal standard.
You got my point
...
i hope no one goes to yale and shoots him, that would suck for optics real bad
Oy vey please dont do anything to hurt the optics! You're going ruin the 1000 year plan for the slow creep of national socialism into the government! It wont accomplish anything goy!