kikes also accuse non-kikes of being kikes and le 'COSNSIPRACY' with retarded/shallow/inconsequential evidence. They especially LOVE to do it when arguing about it means absolutely nothing, and pretending/shilling that it's consequential
Go fuck yourself, for all reasons
>>>/trs/
Shut up, gay
the prosecution would have to argue that he intended to get into a predicament like that, but there's no possibility for this, because even if he intended to run people over, there would be no substantive evidence given that he was surrounded by protestors who were damaging his car and possibly be a threat to his life.
Everyone here on Zig Forums knows that he's innocent of the charges and that the left-wing activist judges have no case, but i guess they'll still waste time trying to get him to send a message how long till Charlottesville looks like paris right now?.
mr shill. what you said makes no sense. people on deathrow are separated from GP and are placed in special cells awaiting their fate. You're thinking of jail, which is a temporary holding place until a convicted gets put into another place.
The second image is pretty autistic, but it's a testament to just how jewish the aut-right is that the one who gets arrested ends up being a member of the tribe. The week of Charlottesville, there was probably record low synagogue attendance nation wide from all the yids traveling to get there.
You're not from here, faggot.
This.
I think it's this. They want more unrest, which they are praying will lead to gun violence, which will give them justification for more "confiscation orders" or maybe even a constitutional convention re: 2A.
They will just make some false flags around keksmas. I'm expecting the false flags to fail this round, gloriously, with great justice, in Kek's name, by righteous duty in action by the blessed ones. Kalki comes.
PRAISE KEK!
SIEG HIEL!
This is your brain on aut-sodomite.
Method of Subversion: Accusing the enemy of being your own.
Example: "X is a Y, here's inconclusive evidence."
How it works: Generally, as with every lie, it reduces the conversation to inconsequentialities.
How it benefits: 1) It wastes time.
2) It can be exploited to suggest you're more powerful than you really are.
3) It sows confusion, madness and pathology.
4) It dissociates your enemy from martyrs.
5) It dissociates your enemy from action.
Implementation: The best way to implement this strategy is by presenting bad or incomplete evidence, so that you're forcing the enemy to disprove a lie. Simultaneously, you protect yourself from repercussion if you're not held to account - either by an appeal to ignorance or being anonymous/unreachable. The best way to take advantage of an enemy's integrity is by questioning it through small lies, since their worldview depends on consistency, especially if in a weaker position - an appeal to 'truth'.
Agitation: Accompanying this method with agitation will provide the benefit of 'hooking' them. Arrogance can also (if done correctly) promote an atmosphere of or validate a culture of pathology - one that exhausts advocates(/enemies) from having to deal with flimsy evidence being treated as 'sufficient enough' to validate splitting or a current split between their best option and an ineffective one, tactically/strategically.
Countering: Generally, bringing up inconsequentialities is a subversive enemy tactic and should be treated/rebuked as such instead of investigated, validated or entertained. In the end, the path of behavior is what ultimately matters - the conclusion led to. If that conclusion is disabling, destructive or inconsequential, then it is not worth consideration. Generally those practicing the behavior will respond with arrogance about this, as that's what's most effective.