Violence Against Elites

While their daughters are being pimped out by rape gangs of middle easterners?
From their perspective? You can't buy a fucking spoon without a license in that fucking turd hole.

>An(((glow)))
It's right there in the name.

Attached: GettyImages-594838193-566744f95f9b583dc3ab08c3.jpg (768x768, 40.76K)

Yes, even now based Nigel Farage is more concerned speaking out against German villainy in the 1800s to young Americans. He needs to drum up anti-European sentiment inside the United States before the coming conflict. Anyone that studies Anglo deception could see this little manipulation coming years ago. Suddenly, the baddies = ethnic Germans, Italians, and Belgians…. not the EU. While they start a war against Russia in the black sea.

Anyways, Anglo-enthusiast inside "far right" circles do not exist… they're all feds.

n1

What a conundrum! the 1st amendment is like the relief valve on a pressurized vessel. Without it or when it fails, things get explosive

Our messiah has left us. Unfortunately he has no plans to come back. What to do?

Attached: train problem.webm (200x234 6.86 MB, 2.85M)

Paul Craig Roberts

Yes?

User blackpilled has elements of narrative ascription. This leads him to have a false application of universality and words, as he ranks such within shooting distance equality with race and blood. This commits source invalidity. This "leaving the door open" does lead to antifa conclusions, thankfully not all the time. As long as he lands on the right side, not many will care to point out the nuanced point of instability.

Back to the film: A correct analysis would have recognized the extremist painting of strawmen caricatures, revealing the solipsistic bias of both the Hollywood producers + financiers + intented kikewashing of the audience. –And– to do so at all points, from all directions. Which BP does… elsewhere and with other content.

However, he slips at times. Ex: See 15min mark. The narration around this point goes off the rails. In BP's support, he is suppose to be black-pilled. However, against any support, is his near marxist fuckery. At this point, right here, BP experiences concomitant condoning of races involved, and other intrinsic accepting of (((anglo jewry))) manipulation. You could call this, a point of internal corruption, specifically revealing Cromwell Ignorance and/or (((Anglo))) excusal. Whether intentional or not is secondary to relevance of: Complete acceptance of the frame of the HollyJew, despite knowing better.

Not that this is a problem. It's hard to care at these points alone. As already stated, if he lands on the right side, it won't get complicated. It is at the times that BP –sets– his picture-jump-painting wrong, where he will quickly find problems. The honest will acutely recognize treason-alike elements in what he says. It is one thing to be black-pilled. It is another thing to lose frame at certain points, to leave the door open, to prevent memory and consequence formation. Why do this?


Further, unrelated to any thing really, is not any form of looping back into moral-reason-dependency (not sure what to call it?) a bit like buying the Movie's frame of selling moral justification as necessary? Wasn't that painted as a bad thing, in the film, only to have the film unironically be dependent on it? A proof of moral invalidity on multiple levels, unwittingly repeating the same unirony within the OPs video? Moral justification is a trait simply more meek, than necessarily (((British))). Not exactly deceptive (it absolutely can at times, see BLM, Hollolies, Migrantism, Globohomo etc). Not exactly necessary. Superfluous.

There is only one universe. If it cannot be afforded, it won't be. Some people want to sell stories, both then and now, to justify this and that. But I don't. We are Statesmen here; Britiain and any (((Anglos))) friendly or not can go take their narrative selling elsewhere.

Daily reminder to filter TORpedos