And also the rest of the threads.
Can the mods do something about the rampant misogyny here...
Connor Diaz
Christian Walker
"no"
Jacob Watson
Some reasons:
The line between a joke and actual misogeny is very vague and subjective. What you think is misogeny I might not label as such.
Also about half the shit yall report for being problematic/pol/wrongthink is posted as a joke by people who have an entirely kosher post history. I am not going to ban a perfectly good poster who has made several responses saying "misogenysts are retarded" and the like, just because he made a post in a shitpost thread "lol yeah litterally enslave womynz #nazbolgang"
Also banning people for having the wrong opinion (by your standards) opens the door for policing the entire community, stifling any discussion and just removing anyone who doesnt agree with the mods on everything. If I had actually banned every person who I thought was retarded and who I would rather not have on this board it would be fukken dead, because honestly most of you have shit-tier beliefs.
But believing yourself to be right 100% of the time, while it is your instinct, is a sign of a narcicist, which is why I try not to ban anyone who is not an obvious spammer or full-time troll.
Levi Diaz
Well that's going too far.Yet it's true that on a lower level, "sexual pleasure and danger often occupy the same space" (sometimes people have murky desires which they let rip into extreme form when they're at the keyboard.)
aeon.co
And make it into another Tumblr or left Twitter *sigh*. Those spaces already exist for those that want them. Here you do get racism and misogyny.
But it's a no-holds-barred free-for-all. There's nothing stopping anyone from posting about feminist heroines.aviators, suffragists, anything (We've had neo-Nazi's posting about obscure finance ministers in the Third Reich recently, so I don't think anyone can complain.)
Hunter Cook
Keep up the good work.
Michael Parker
Elijah King
We, Zig Forums, despise anything related to idpol. Feminism, M.R.A/M.G.T.O.W/Incels, Black Lives Matter, Identity Evropa, nazism… all of them are different variations of the same idpol garbage.
If you bring up feminism or any of the idpol ideologies on a board explicitly opposed to identity politics, we'll call you a Zig Forums LARPer, because that's what you are.
Charles Wilson
Somehow I get the impression that your criteria for success in this regard are impossible for anyone to achieve due to consisting solely of the precept "no valid criticism of feminism can exist".
Fixed.
Lucas Foster
This board is private property. You can't ban by consensus here. A communist isn't someone who lives in a commune in Greenwich. A communist is someone who believes that capitalist exploitation should be supplanted by worker control of the MoP through a complete rout of the current government. Communism does not, and cannot, exist within a capitalist system. So long as BO exercises absolute, unilateral authority, this board cannot be a product of democracy, much less communist. All the tone policing in the world won't change that.
Idpol is a lie, a glittering generalization intended to muddle the waters by making false equivalences between fundamental unequal material conditions. MRAs are shitheads. Anyone who has a proper understanding of class is a feminist. It's impossible to be a socialist without also being a feminist. The liberation of all of us depends on the liberation of each of us.
Hunter James
At least you finally admit to liking capitalism when it suits you.
You're not getting banned (as much as we'd like to banhammer any idpol group). Unfortunately, you can shitpost about feminism as much as you want; just don't expect a warm welcome.
We told Zig Forums LARPers falseflagging as nazbols to fuck off. What makes you think we're gonna accept you? We hate any idpol group; regardless if they are male, female or any of the septillion made up genders that your kind pulled straight out of your asses.
How's this even related to the topic we are discussing? Either way, feminism can coexist within a capitalist structure; even intersectional feminism can exist within capitalism (ie: Caythlin Jener and Beyonce; both part of "minority" groups and still bourgeois as it comes).
The bourgeoisie can be as diverse as you want, and cheerlead for feminism, like Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton does; yet they are the very reason why we are in this mess, and so are people like you.
Yeah, and we don't like them, precisely for being a bunch of whiny faggots. The very same kind of whiny cunts feminists are.
That'd be true, if it weren't for the fact that there are people within the feminist movement that couldn't give two shits about others that aren't female (Meghan Murphy, Cathy Brennan, Germaine Greer, Andrea Dworkin, Calerie Solanas, Mary Daly… the list goes on).
Are some feminist egalitarians? Sure. Is feminism primarily focused on gender equality? No, not at all. TERFs, SWERFs, lesbian separatists, female supremacists… all of them support feminism, because feminism is about female emancipation, and it can come at the expense of everyone else.
Tl;dr: Non spooked socialist women focused on class struggle are always welcome here, because we don't care abour their gender. Feminist faggots, regardless of what they have between their legs, are not welcome here.
If you don't feel welcome here, that's your problem, not ours. We're not gonna create a safe space for your constant virtue signalling and slacktivism. If you wanna be a first worldist "socialist" feminist so much, then go back to r/socialism. You're not gonna be missed here.