Pine tree climing WHG monkey, they wont find that without EEA (East Eurasian ancestry) as its mongoloid male Y-DNA lineage.
Deal with it, Mongoloid male Y-DNA R dominates Europe today cuz you are product of rape.
Y-DNA P (asia/oceania) -> Y-DNA P1 (asia) → Y-DNA R (asia/siberia) -> small band of R1 men conquer Europe in Bronze age.
yup, confirmed asian
your Tianyuan-like subhuman ancestors are the ones raped by mostly west Eurasian-like peoples carrying Y-DNA P1, cope
Germanic is a linguo-cultural group not a race, teutons are nordic by extent you retarded fucking moron
All Haplogroups come from Northern India you retard
Haplogroup P was found in North India/Central-Asia
Haplogroup R was found in Siberia/Central-Asia
DNA analysis show that majority of Modern Europeans have no Asian admixture
IJK to be exact
So much butthurt in here
The Paleo European Nordic Race of I1/I2 Haplogroup were These civilisation starters in ancient Times
Indo Europeans are migrants and Anatolian farmers as the posters said
/thread
If R1b was introduced by the Yamnaha like tribes, why is R1a not the dominant haplogroup in Western Europe, but R1b? Conversely, why is R1b found in such small, if found at all, frequencies in Eastern Europe and places as far as India, where the R1a Indo Europeans had a huge impact on the genetic make up of the population, with Brahmin being majority R1a?
My hypothesis is that Mal’ta and his culture boy were indeed the progenitors of both R1b and R1a, but that R1b crossed over into Northern America via Beringia and, via the ice bridge between Europe and Northern America, entered Europe. I am indeed describing a more or less reverse Solutrean hypothesis.
Yamnaya were ~100% R1b, not R1a
both R1b and R1a were already in Europe >10k years ago, R1b as west as south France among WHG foragers with small ANE and as east as the Latvia, R1a never more west than Ukraine among EHGs with high ANE
Yamnaya itself had no R1a as far as the record goes
given that both ultimately relate to groups linked to ANE, it's not that surprising that different elites succeeded with similar but slightly different lineages, and these different elites are also related to the differences in language among western IE speakers like Italo-Celts and Germanic to a degree, and eastern ones
it's very similar with I1/I2 in north/south Europe, or J1/J2 in west asia
I2 was the majority lineage among north European foragers in the mesolithic, then I1 took over likely due to some powerful elite succesfully incorporating itself with steppe newcomers
while R1b perhaps represented the early successful IE elites, who managed to spread west first(due to military superiority, but also due to the plague hitting neolithic farmers hard in the west, leaving lots of space available), I think they simply eventually got took over by their R1a cousins, thus R1b losing its majority in the east
Yamnaya was in South-West-Russia/Ukraine, we do not have samples from Central-Russia/Belarus from that time
umap.openstreetmap.fr
R1b in Central/Western Europe comes up with the Bell Beaker cultures
Haplogroups R/Q are ancestral to the EHGs
K = 14 with modern samples
genetiker.wordpress.com
K = 11 takes Amerindian apart to Siberian/East-Asian/EHG admixture (but it is older, K14 has more accurate results)
genetiker.wordpress.com
EHGs lived from Central-Asia/Siberia to Eastern-Europe, until they were replaced by Asians, who came mostly from two sources (Samoyedic people from the Taymyr Peninsula in Russia and East-Asian people)
Admixture and haplogroups are listed under sheet 2
docs.google.com
Also