How to fix all of our economic problems

The following was posted on plebbit during an AMA with Donald Trump during the election:

To summarize the benefits of the proposal upfront:

can be completed within 2-3 years (less than one term in office)

costs up to $30 trillion but generates $18 trillion in revenue per year upon completion (costs are very, very conservative high end estimates as you will see later and ~$5T is more reasonable but I don’t want to oversell)

at the end of 4 years, you have a net profit of $6T plus $18T in revenue every year thereafter

In other words, in your final year as president you can:

pay off the national debt

cut taxes to 0% across the board

maintain all government spending without any further taxation

start cutting a check to every American every year for $50,000

The project outline:

Launch 100,000 tons of material into GEO using the Falcon Heavy at a cost of $1000/kg for total rocket costs of $100 billion

This 100,000 ton of material is used to build a capturing device for payloads sent into space with a rail gun (the simplest idea, but not the best, is to think of it like a big fluffy mattress in orbit - you can hit the mattress with your rail gun payloads to bring them to rest with respect to your target in geosynchronous orbit)

To give you an estimate of the railgun costs, high performance maglev tracks cost about $100 million per mile and we need 100 mile long track to keep the gee loading of launches within human survivability. That’s $10 billion, but adding a factor of 10 call it $100 billion for our launch device

The purpose of this system is to launch 17TW/s of solar power capacity into GEO.

Here, I have used NASA’s estimates of material costs from 2012 with an economy of scale gained from 500MW production (34,000 times smaller than the actual scale, therefore grossly inflated costs on a per unit basis)

$400 million material costs (solar panels, wireless transmission, mirrors, etc.) per 500 MW translates to $13.6T for 17GW of power.

To maintain the orbit of our capturing device, we have to provide thrust equal and opposite to whatever is imparted on the arriving payloads. NASA uses 25 kilogram ion thrusters that produce 90 mN of thrust which is the same as requiring 500 second burn time to correct for its own capture. A practical launch sequence for the project is something like this:

Send up 500 MW of solar power generation capacity and 25,000 ion thrusters (what 500 MW can power)

It takes 50 days for these 25,000 ion thrusters to correct the orbit of the station

Every doubling of power output thereafter takes only 50 days and we need 16 doubling cycles to reach 17TW or ~26 months

Finally, the weight of the wireless transmission capacity is roughly equal to the weight of solar panels + mirrors + structural support, etc., so we need one last doubling cycle to send up the necessary equipment to beam our 17TW of power back down to Earth.

The net result is that we’ve paid for 850 million ion thrusters at a cost of $10,000 a piece or $8.5 trillion on top of our $13.6 trillion in solar panels / mirrors / wireless transmission / etc.

If you employ 10 million people at $100,000/year for 3 years as part of the project, that costs a further $3 trillion

net total is ~$26T

The global average electricity cost is about $0.12/kwh so 17TW/s power generation is equivalent to $18T in revenue.

Some practical notes:

material costs can be expected to drop ~95% from an increase in production scale factor 34,000 so our material inputs of $22 trillion is more likely close to $1 trillion

I’ve calculated thrust requirements based on a vertical launch from Earth, but the more practical design is an angled launch so that our projectile arrives with a substantial portion (90%) of its orbital velocity, thereby reducing thrust requirements 90%

We recapture ~30% of salaries paid ($3 trillion) in taxes plus economists put the multiplier effect of infrastructure programs at around 3 which makes them approximately revenue nuetral (i.e. further recapturing 30% of 3x your expenditure) without considering the benefits of the project in the long run

we can build an orbital ring to support wired transmission of power back to Earth for less than the cost of sending up wireless transmission capacity

Therefore the more reasonable cost estimate is something like $1.1T (material) + $1T (GEO capture device + railgun launcher) + $3T (human labor at high salaries) but all of this should be considered revenue neutral due to stimulative effects.

Other urls found in this thread:

eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/correlation-of-per-capita-energy
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Ok but what if, and hear me out here, we unkike our "money" instead? There was a guy once who managed to do it.

It sounds cool and would be yet another engineering feat we could do, so it is worth it on those grounds alone, but you forget 1 thing: muds and jews still exist.

...

Also a good idea.

Suicide.

I don't think Australia can get much hotter.

Literally every single technology in existence was created with blacks and jews walking the earth.

?

How to actually fix our economy

Stop usury
Return to an [x] standard, back the dollar with something fucking real
Stop giving the military billions to defend Israel
Strip back more regulations on business
Cut taxes further, implement a flat tax system
stop buying from china

This isn't an either/or situation.

They economy can't be fixed if men are oppressed 2nd class citizens and women are going to school, having careers, doing what they please, owning property etc.

Each woman has a massive negative financial impact on the economy

Attached: cumul.jpg (574x272, 38.45K)

It's a good plan.
Definitely doable though I'm not sure the USA could pull it off.

That's nice but it won't solve anything economically. No technology has.

Cheap plentiful energy wouldn't solve anything?

I can't imagine being this much of a brainlet.

You left out purging the useless niggers

What is cheap about this and when has cheaper energy sources solved our problems? The government will still charge the same amounts and the sources of our current economic issues still remain.

Do you honestly think something like this could be built in a post affirmative action world?

Attached: 256393main_Group_Tight_904.jpg (904x679, 693.73K)

One can dream…

Citation for chart?

Separate issues. Start a thread if you want to talk about them.


60-360% return doesn't sound compelling to you? Energy use and GDP are very tightly correlated.

eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/correlation-of-per-capita-energy

GDP has nothing to do with the economy. GDP has gone up while real wages and purchasing power has gone down.

You don't need this to 'fix' our economic owes. The world already has solar systems here on Earth as well as windmills. Why haven't our economic woes lessened? Free energy right?

Money is an abstract concept of resources and is the root of all kinds of evil. Our economic woes largely come from usury and greed. God understood how destructive this was to an economy, hence why he ordered that Israel's private debts be cleared every 7 years. Obama could have done this during the economic recession, but he instead kept the debts in place and bailed out the banks.

Attached: The heart and the soul.jpg (500x293, 41.2K)

How is that a separate issue? The only countries that could even attempt to produce it with current employment practices would be China or Japan.

Why not nuclear?

The Simpson's said that's bad

GAS THE KIKES

'free energy' is possible. Tesla had it all worked out, but his extreme economic naivety hampered his efforts at 'harnessing the power of the earth for the benefit of mankind'.
(Fucking hell, have you seen the size of JP Morgan's hooter?)

Attached: 220px-JohnPierpontMorgan.png (220x296, 42.21K)

are you retarded or do you just not know that "a solution" will never be realized BY DESIGN.

What this fails to mention is that the GEO capture device + railgun launcher will continue to be of value once the initial project is completed, meaning the US will have a functional alternative to the costly and inefficient chemical booster platform it currently relies upon.
Coupled with ion/EM drives, plus the practically-free means by which to power them, we could be looking at a Golden Space Age, with America dominating orbital – possibly lunar – space.


Beat me to it.
The moneyed-interests of traditional energy will not go gentle into that good night.

and what happens if it gets hit by a meteor

Congratulations, you just destroyed every coal mining company, half of the petroleum industry, every nuclear power plant, every power plant period, and have 10 million people unemployed after a 3 year space railgun has been made. This doesn't fix the economy, but it is cool. Also, this will never happen because who owns the mining companies and the power plants? We can't move forward until we address the semitic scourge.

You'd be doing us a favor.
t. Australia

Found the Jew

Who do you think owns the mining companies and power plants?

how about we use some of the massive amounts of nearly free energy to clean up out environment and employ a few million to do that?

And then, we'll use some MORE of that free energy to expand industry into space and the moon. So what the fuck exactly are you talking about guy?

Genocide niggers

So we're going to fix the economy by launching shit into orbit with a railgun and then making an orbital power generation station.

Well it's a neat idea but it still doesn't get rid of the niggers and jews.

Why not orbital solar?

Just hear me out here.
Electric powered ovens

Better be sockpuppets

WAC Bennett

Attached: aa1f2738-d9a4-4bf7-b6e4-a2c4bc7ac752-A35777_141.jpg (382x480, 20.05K)

The trips confirm is a chosenite

Ending the fed sounds like a much better plan. But i doubt 8zion Zig Forums can even begin to fathom doing so

This guy in this chat room wouldn't stop talking about rail guns and green walls, is that you OP?

OP shows a lack of reasonable priorities.

GDP is the fucking economy. Distribution of wealth is a separate issue from the size of your economy.

>destroying (((big oil))) is bad

That's the best you can do, shlomo?

what effect would the transmission of all that (microwave?) energy through the atmosphere have on it and birds? Sounds kinda dodgy to me.

It would create extra heat, but that can be mitigated by things like a solar shade if needed. Narrowly directed microwaves wouldn't be nearly the threat to birds that even wind power is today.

Paying interest on Federal Reserve loans don't give two shits about your technology.

Dat'll nevah happen, goy. Now sign on da dotted line to complete da loan process!

Attached: wooden lampshade.png (448x539, 330.8K)

0/10

And redduts have the gull to wonder how everyone knows they're retarded

Jews would never allow this. Any increase in GDP means jews leverage the income by taking out more loans on the peoples' behalf such that the goyim aren't able to make interest payments on the increased national debt, even with this increased productivity
Yes, jewery is politically relevant to the topic.
Yeah, that'll happen in JewSA
See above
You can just have the fed print that out and distribute it as UBI, they've already printed like $200k/head for their own pockets, what's another $50k?

Attached: 1516434469880.jpg (2335x1800, 2.48M)

Well, you would have to hide where it came from and use the user distribution model so it couldn't be (((shut down))). It's the answer to everything. Greedy faggots wanting shekels is precisely what gets them killed. You would have to be committed to winning, not making money. The same goes for destroying kike banks.

Greed lets the Rottenchilds win.

Turns out the habiru are allergic to gamma rays. Hmmm.

You’re an idiot.
-“Pay off national debt”
You can’t pay off the debt as every dollar issued is already in debt.

or we could just stop giving money to niggers and let them die out

I want Based Solar Power.
It involves putting every single jew and shabbos goy into specially built cargo ships and launching them into the heart of the sun.
A galactic ovening for the ages.

What? Im the jew because im pointing out that you have unreasonable priorities? There are a million different things that need to be mended internally within European nations before you can start your starwars megastructure project.
You're gonna spend as much on this solar panel as you would on interests you owe on the money you loaned to build it by the time it's finished you quack.
If you want to build something like this as a nation you need control of your own currency, which is something you don't currently have.

Attached: 4352534636.png (100x100, 2.27K)

If theories of differential accumulation are correct, the only way to fix the economy would be by a prolonged period of anti-monopolism operating through the teeth of stagflation.

(((Anything that zeroes taxes fails. Anything that pays off the national debt fails. These things have purposes other than the obvious. Reductions are possible, but not eliminations. Anything that cuts massive checks to everyone diminishes the value of massive checks until they are at best moderate checks.)))

This project would also tend to cause stagflation according to other theories. That said, real supply increases are real supply increases; the electricity would be real.

For global concerns, projects like this should be sited wherever they would displace the largest amount of fossil fuel power. It deserved to be pointed out also that covering the Sahara with solar panels would likely be more economical.

They wouldn't. Humans breed in suffering poverty. Africa's population projections are awful because Africa's QoL sucks. (Explosive growths also pin down QoL, go figure.) You have to get infant mortality down, you have to open up channels of information. Make people live with their breeding decisions, but give them the best information to do so.

Elon Musk's project to blanket the earth with satellite internet is a good ideam

Fuck off and go old Tesla tech pumping electricity fro mthe atmospehere, it's practically old public patent info at this point. Just no one's paying attention. Or McCanney's Wing generator.

This project is retarded going the path of most resistance. It smells just like the most ianne space related idea ever - space elevator. Please have mercy with this retardation.

Attached: j4yju6ju7j6.jpg (506x513, 39.07K)

Reminder to people: if you love this stuff, go back to school. It won't work like OP says, but that's not to say nothing like it will ever work.

Why not just do something easy like colonize another planet or send a generation ship to another star system

Easy solution: Don't fix it
Let America burn down, it very existance is disgrace to mankind

either dumb kraut or jihadi kraut.

Whatever man, what are you an economist? You don't understand how complex the economy is. 60 trillion debt and no purchasing power is totally necessary if you're smart and have credentials.

Attached: boomerbubble.png (650x750, 26.71K)

Which doesn't mean shit to the consumer. Most people only care about purchasing power (how much their fukcing time(life) is being 'valued' at). And frankly, that's not coming back until many people are removed from power.

Ground arrays are much cheaper and we have hundreds of thousands of square miles of desert wasteland to put them in. We already have a massive black budget space program and several operating space frames, giant space stations with a construction truss box on the other side of a huge common truss bus. Look up the ATSS, the whole point of the Shuttle program was to build the ATSS which has been photographed by John Lenard Walson and others.

nonsense. metal doesn't care about 9Gs OP. send it up at the highest velocity that economizes economics/physics vs. oxidation through the atmosphere.

Show the math