What Zig Forums needs to do

That wouldn't matter. It's not like VPNs don't exist. It's an ideology which has to be banned. Every other board is allowed to do it. Zig Forums isn't.

Zig Forums can't do anything because its too red-pilled.
Its so used to being fucked in the ass by jews that it can't trust anyone or anything.

A lot of companies have shared VPNs provided that have a limit on the number of active connections so employees are only encouraged to use them when necessary, so if you force all the JIDF soldiers that come here to use a VPN there might be less of them. At the very least it would be a good symbolic move to complement banning Jews on sight.

Why ban them? By attacking us, they are making us stronger. We need to be exposed to the enemy at all times, to have the evolutionary pressure. We need to create memes that are impervious to any form of kikery, and they are helping us achieve that. In fact, I wish they sent their best instead of typical rabble. Creating an echo-chamber is not constructive. Excessive kikery is not either, and should be banned.

You can print posters and tape them at blind spots not visible by cameras, or in front of them but by covering your identity. Use gloves so they can't find your fingerprints. They can contain an attention-grabbing, thought provoking high density meme and a link to some protected website. Leave random flyers at all kinds of places, parks, public transportation, the choices are endless.

True, as much as I enjoy religious debates, they should be contained within one thread at best and relegated to fringe. Each of those should be tested rigorously against the common objectives based on it's most common application. For example, if Catholic church is serving the globalist Jews and it's doctrine is enabling race-mixing, your special snowflake understanding of it will not save it from scrutiny and judgement.

Even better, we can inverse the D&C of those threads and try to create a NS version of each of those religions that's within the 'party line' . Each of their followers should then substitute that version in stead of current poz'd version of it. For example, NS Christians would promote racialism/(ethno)nationalism among Christian communities, atheists among atheist ones, pagans among pagan ones etc. and fight both Neoliberals and Trotskyists currently controlling the same.

We are scattered around many countries, and they have (((civ-nat))) govs serving globalist jewry while meekly pretending to be independent entities. If their global hegemony is threatened, their back-up plan is to step back and cause some more wars to incite "patriotic" feelings and get whites killing each other again.

Zig Forums can't even figure out that Trump is a cuck, let alone organize its message. 4 years lost to (((hand wringing))) over how losing day after day, month after month, might somehow be 4D chess.

But when you're winning for real you don't need anyone to tell you you're winning.

we need to clearly and effectively communicate the answers to the following questions to the public, while keeping in mind that any gaps will be filled in by our ideological enemies, and they will not be charitable:
1.) - what do we want?
We must create a complete blueprint for a hypothetical, newly-founded country run by us, a full foundational document containing a full list of systems, laws, and policies, nothing must be left out, nothing it too "common sense" or mundane to disqualify it from inclusion, everything must be spelled out from the ground up, remember, the pubic perception of us is that we are completely unhinged from reality, we need to prove how grounded we are by spelling out even the most minor of things.
2.) - What will we do to achieve it?
We need to detail a complete plan for making our stated goals a reality, not only do we have to make clear what we will do, we must also make it very clear what we won't do, we must create a set of rules and standards for our members to operate by, again, it is vital that every possible thing is mentioned and clearly spelled out, we do not have the benefit of being anything other than explicit, thorough, exhaustive, and crystal clear, noting is beneath mention here. we must also make clear how we will ensure that our members will operate within the rules we have laid out, I'm taking punishments here, every violation needs to have it's punishment laid out in full, and these must be penalties we plan on actually applying with complete consistency, we do not have the benefit of making even a single exception for even a the smallest of violations by even the highest raking member. And yes, we have members, we are a hierarchical species by nature, and hierarchies will always naturally emerge from a collection of like-minded people, this is why even decentralized communities like the atheist, pagan, and christian communities on jewtube eventually developed their own leaders and codes of conduct, despite the general resistance.

3.) - Why do we believe what we believe? / What are the arguments for our case?
We need to create a normie-friendly list of facts and figures, it must be complete, well-organized, and well-sourced. We must do this for everything from science, medicine, and statistics, to the softer subjects like history, archaeology, and anthropology. Essentially, we must write textbooks, or encyclopedias, or wikis, that put every piece of hidden knowledge in the same area in the same place. he natural state of normies towards us is distrust, they believe we have extremely low standards for evidence, and that we are pseudoscientists or pseudohistorians or quacks, they see us like we see, well, basically every institution that influences the beliefs of the public, so we need to rigorously source everything we put down.
What's more, normies have the annoying habit of assuming that we are ignorant of very entry level and ubiquitous facts, they assume we cannot see the minorites all around us, the ones who seem to act just like white people from a normies' day-to-day experience, we need to assure them that we have all the knowledge and experiences they do, and that it is the light of additional information that has resulted in our perspectives. We need to stop being self-destructing assholes and openly address the fact that most blacks a normie will meet when they go out every day, will not be acting like niggers. We need to put the "Angry Goy" version of reality aside if we don't want to come across as completely fucking delusional and psychotic.

The other thing is to address the difference between the scientific community and science, the historical community and history, the medical community and medicine, etc. we need to highlight how morally incorrect statements can be true, and how morally correct statements can be false, and make comparisons between the current reign of the left wing creationists and the reign of the religious creationists, we can point out how logical fallacies are being used by those who once condemned the use of logical fallacies in the past. There's a lot more to go on, but anyone who remembers new atheism and the god wars on jewtube should recall how they dealt with arguing for things that were offensive; atheists that were once being called immoral for being atheists, are now calling other atheists racist for being honest about race and immigration, and in both cases the argument served the same purpose: to shut down the debate by demonizing and shaming the opponent and those who could possibly be persuaded to agree with them, and to prevent people from listening to what they have to say, the left doesn't win debates, for they cannot possibly hope to do that, instead, the left prevents the debates from happening, it's essentially two people entering the debating hall, one shooting the other before threatening everyone in the audience with the gun, and then winning the debate by default without it ever happening, because no one wants to be shot next.

OK, so the last one went on way too long, but it was all necessary to enlighten you on how to go about taking into account the normie experiences, and how they shape their perspective, normies do not trust anyone without a degree, and degrees are often withheld from those of our political perspective on things, both in and out of academia, we need to break this delusion of authority = arbiter of truth, we need to show the fallacy of scientific credentials being a requirement for being able to do or produce good science, the level of corruption within academia, and how this scares scientists into towing a specific party line, even if that party line is wholly divorced from the body of scientific data, etc.

Came here to post this.

Tome.is was absolutely a great idea, but it was poorly executed, and so it died, we need our own wiki, not metapedia, not infogalactic, one of our own.
and we need to include a wiki-manifesto so we can finally begin the process of creating our country, even if only by writing the foundational documents, it's still a powerful force for us.
For one thing, the average Zig Forumsack knows less about the general political opinion of Zig Forums than the FBI does, this will fix that, we will finally know what Zig Forums generally supports in terms of politics.
Second, it allows us to know what we should be advocating in terms of political policies, we will appear less chaotic and more like an actual movement with a synchronized message, what more, we can finally stop being vague, what kind of political policies does the poster of "it's okay to be white" endorse? if there's one thing the left has on us in terms of PR, it's an explicit and (apparently) consistent message.
Last but not least, we will finally know what Zig Forums means by "National Socialist", because we know damn well it doesn't mean the kind of NDSAP of Hitler's Germany, the differences between the two are obvious to anyone who knows about the Hitler National Socialism.
It could be strongly similar to it, but we know Zig Forums generally agrees on making some changes, well, now we get to see what those changes are, and then we can openly discuss them once they are right on front of us on paper.