you can make a massive amount of progress with just a little bit eugenic activity. it should be noted that diminishing returns kick in very fast, and the likelihood of messing up the entire gene pool increases with the amount of eugenics that you implement. humans already know how to mate. we aren't mutant negroes who need somebody to tell us how to create offspring that are better than ourselves. nature already knows how to select. there's no reason to be so greedy about this. there are so many efficient and time-tested systems available to us already, and most are not being utilized currently. you should do that before going the unnatural kike-inspired route. embracing administrative extremism before you are even in adequate contact with the primal is actually retarded.
it should also be noted that the reproductive desire is one of the most powerful things in a man. unless you want to maintain the state of women being loose and on birth control with all the men addicted to porn, you're going to end up with very bloody conflict if you try to implement any of the eugenical autism that is often suggested on this board.
then have a societal system consisting of four castes: and then the people will pair themselves. if this is what you want to do then it should be done indirectly. some system where you get your name put into a database with a social credit score and you're then given a list of approved mates is what shills will push in these threads.
and anyways, none of this should really be planned to be implemented before all kikes are destroyed, therefore all of this is just theoretical.
Nature and biology are the most cruel, emotion-less, unforgiving, uncaring Eugenecists ever known to man. What would nature and biology do?
Andrew Rogers
it would be in the interests of nature and biology to kill those who would try to usurp its place at the top of the hill. using cunning to go against nature, or attempting to kill/dominate it is generally the judaic route. if whites played the "if you can't beat them, join them" game and caused it to be in the interest of nature itself to decree their propagation then that sounds like a good thing to me. this is not quite a symbiotic relationship because we cannot be completely be classified as two entirely separate organisms
Honestly, the next few centuries of eugenics will mostly be weeding out the objectively unfit useless eaters. I'm not talking about ugly autistic people that hurt your feefees, I'm talking about brainlet downs syndrone abominations. We got our work cut out for us for a while before we can even get to the point of raising the standard.
Joseph Phillips
yeah the very obvious ones like down syndromers would be a good start. the greek practice of abandoning unfit children by leaving them out on something like a nearby hillside is an attractive idea. it would also help to get people conscious of eugenics which is big. simply having people be aware of their own personal eugenic ability within their immediate relations should form the backbone of eugenic program, in my current opinion.
We need to discuss Eugenics to reverse the Judaic tainting of societal norms which produced the narcissistic do-nothing useless eaters of today, all believing that they are special snowflakes making the planet a better place by offering nothing more than their mere presence.
Nature and biology gave us a group which were the best of the best in physical and mental abilities imbued with aesthetics that the entire planet recognized as the standard of 'beauty'
Isaac Foster
Good news OP, all this lives on and today goes under the name, 'bioethics'. You just need to know how to navigate the literature. The great work continues.
Joshua Fisher
We need to make Whites incompatible with non-Whites. Race-mixing must be abolished on a genetic level. Also, there are some hard-wired instincts in women which proved useful in the past, but now lead to irrational decisions.
