Their standard is basically a day trader with $6,000,000 in the bank account and a Ferrari for a day car. Because women today view themselves as men without penises, if you only have a degree like her, she basically views you as herself and is therefore not attracted at all. Unless you want to settle for something utterly mediocre, you're gonna need huge leverage.
Strayan law girl got raped by Paki in Paki
Elijah Baker
Alexander Cook
The irony of all of this is, a white woman applies these standards to white men only, yet will bed with a poor, dumb, unsuccessful nigger. Career women fuck loads of shit-skins and niggers, yet white men? Oh, you have to be progressive, accepting of her independence, "well-educated," successful or driven to achieve success etc. She'll only fuck a white man if she's 45 and he's 20 and fit, or if she still retains sexual value, only if he's above her on the social/business ladder.
Grayson Johnson
Because at the end of the day, women don't truly believe that they're men without penises. It's a delusion. They still have their deep down instincts and those get triggered by violent, barbaric behaviour. And because a lot of whites are cucks, some women go for black men. The truth is, what we've been taught about the correct way to behave and what civilised men are is BS. Further back than one hundred years ago, there were no nerds, no limp wristed intellectuals, no numales, etc. Those are all new creations. The norm was red-blooded predators who were ready to fight for what was theirs. Even the intellectuals were bad-asses, like Julius Evola who joined the military in WW2 to fight against the enemies. He even walked around in bomb raids to test his fate and when shrapnel severed his spine he laughed about it. Keep in mind the guy was an engineering PhD, too. If you want to get an Aryan woman's panties creamy, become a cultured barbarian.
Benjamin Williams
I'd sooner write her off as trash, but I am curious by what the fuck you mean by "cultured barbarian."
Blake Bailey
Did you read the entire post? It's pretty clear
Nolan Garcia
Not really. Men 100 years ago didn't do anything differently from men today, save for speak freely, but they weren't faced with threat of a loss of their income and social status if they did back then. As for being an impulsive monkey like a nigger, that's off the table. What day to day differences were there between men in 1919 and men in 2019, save for fashion choices and society in general? We didn't make this society, and we're no longer homogeneous like they were in 1919. What difference is there?
Zachary Adams
They get education to be around males with better earning prospects. They think "
William Morales
"If i increase my value there will be a more valuable guy for me there". Total hipergamy, not education or knowledge.
Ryan Green
A potentially violent and dangerous person who is capable of distributing force and violence in a competent and effective manner who is also cultured, i.e., high-class, in dress and behaviour; well-read, well-educated, having a wide knowledge of culture, from Hellenic to Archeo-Scandinavian; trained in interlocution, and more!
The potency is in the duality, both elements combing to throw other off and make you look mysterious powerful. When it comes to women, it intrigues them and the masculinity has their orifice spewing effluvia in passion!
Don't be a cuqq, become a cultured barbarian!!!
Henry Collins
No, I said the only thing different is they spoke freely, but that's only because they wren't suppressed by society and the threat of financial and social loss. What they said was socially acceptable back then, and society was homogeneous back then. Big difference. Men from 1919 wouldn't speak freely in 2019 either. Also men from back then are the ones who allowed all of this to happen. We were just born into it.