Can national socialist monarchy be compatible?

(heil'd)
If it is a really left wing ideology for the shake of the argument, how do we get people to convert after the shit libturds (((establishment))) and degenerates had done and think we may lead them to that dribble, do we tell them the truth or lie and say we are 3rd position?

The hardship has to be organic. Leadership comes from the heart, and from all of the real world experience a man has. It's impossible to teach a man to be a leader. He has to learn that himself. He has to find his own will to be.

The old saying goes that you can bring a horse to water but you can't make it drink.

Nope, oligarchies always fail because the condition for them to be good is dependent on human nature, and human nature by default is greed/corruption/evil. If it's not the first generation of the oligarchy that is corrupt, the generations that follow will be. The fatal flaw in all systems that rely solely on people is human nature.

This is why a Constitutional Republic (rule of law) is the most resilient of all forms of government yet discovered. Of course, it's only as good as the design of the constitution, and therein lies the problem because the constitution is written by humans trying to account for vast complexity.

I guess that makes, since I would say caesar or hitler are the best examples of what you just described.

Sounds like fucking hell and another jewish trick in our history books.
Not even constitutional republic is just as good, is kinda hard to believe national socialism is the only good ideology though we have not seen the long terms of it to see if it will hold up even today.
To bad the kikes destroyed it before we even got a glimpse if it will do good in the future.
Another redpill swallowed.

Yep, Hitler is the best modern example. Many men just like him gave up hope and died in the trenches. Many took their own lives out of despair after the war. What made Hitler unique was his will to live. Every time he was beaten down it only made him angrier and angrier, driving him forward to greatness.

Sounds like the majority of Zig Forums.

NatSoc is Third Position and leftwing. Both are true. Third positionism merely means in opposition to both capitalism and communism. There is no contradiction.

I don't support national socialism because socialism is fatally flawed. I am a hardcore nationalist though. The first iteration of the constitution was simply insufficient to prevent human nature form corrupting the country. After this country collapses and IF we get another shot at it, we need to correct it based on what failed and improve it. Rinse and repeat until we either find a really good framework to constrain human nature, or we're all dead.

Which isn't a bad thing I suppose.