I misread user.
Can national socialist monarchy be compatible?
Michael Miller
Jeremiah Flores
That's almost as dumb as people who imagine the political axis to be all about liberty vs tyranny.
There are good reasons to make the right to rule hereditary. People are the most invested in their children and guaranteeing their offspring will inherit their kingdom extends this investment to their kingdom as well. I believe this is a primary reason why certain forces toiled to destroy monarchy and spread democracy. It's obvious that (((corruption))) and (((subversion))) are the greatest problem of democracy, because the rulers have no personal investment in the government whatsoever. This is what allows every single congresscritter to be bought with relatively minor sums of money.
As if any human system is not entirely dependent on human nature. Your constitution has no power on its own and is being/will be completely thrown out of the window as soon as there's a reason to do so. Tell me how much your constitution has protected your freedom of speech when one of the last bastions of free speech in the world are anonymous internet forums and even these can't be allowed to exist and must be spammed by shills 24/7.
Do you realize what you're saying makes no sense?
John Garcia
I've had to do it before, but I'd like you to pay attention to what a bot looks like.
Of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these
Nathaniel Richardson
And better reasons not to. Namely IT'S BEEN TRIED AND IT'S FAILED
Christopher Jones
I prefer a strict Constitutional Republic, heavily anti-government and nationalist. This IMO is the only solution that is viable. The found fathers managed to come up with a system that has lasted 200+ years before failing. It was a good first iteration. We just need to study how the system was corrupted by the kikes (gold standard/central bank being a huge reason), and write a new constitution to make that impossible to do again.
Nolan Baker
Even if it is more strict how do we improve the system without letting kikes find loopholes and takin advantage of it?
Gonna go to sleep looking forward to have a discussion about this.
Julian Torres
That's the exact same fail rate as every system tried in the last several thousand years. Meaning it's a failure. 200 years with the last hundred kiked is a failure. You won't found even a 1000 year Reich like that, pleb
Angel Nelson
What do you think the purpose of law is? Law is by nature and design to supersede human nature by outlining the societal enforcement thereof. What's that saying about rules? It's what sets us apart from the animals.
What about scarcity confuses you exactly?
Matthew Walker
I don't even want a leader with children. I want one who will be fully devoted to the nation and folk. A family will only drag him down in such an important position. Families are for the common man. And no, the US government wasn't bought and sold because these politicians don't have kids. It happened because they're weak. Because they haven't been kicked in the balls enough times to know their right hands from their own assholes. They're morons, and they're unfit to rule.
Joseph Ortiz
The current republic/democracy paradigm will pass too. Everything fails given enough time and there's no reason to believe they're replaced with the best. That's a ridiculous argument. Hereditary rule existed for thousands of years in many different parts of the world during much more unstable and difficult times, and none of those societies were so badly subverted by kikes as the USA was in a couple decades.