News 2/20

Since your first sentence is wrong, I have no guarantee that the rest is right.

It's amazing how aGGroes were such an exact, perfect fit for every one of Wikipedia's weaknesses.

Gamergate became a shitshow after right wing retards jumped on the bandwagon to promote their white nationalist horseshit, not because of gamergate itself. Gamergate is a valid anti-corporate, pro-gaming movement and only we can bring it to a succesful conclusion.

That's not even the entire problem with Wikipedia. There were and still are (according to Wikipedia's own standards) acceptable sources to make that article more neutral. What happens on the GG article was mass bannings of neutrality advocates and admin favoritism. Some of the corruption came to a head in subsequent artibration committee hearings over the years not involving GG but including many of the same dishonest actors. Wikipedia has a fundamentally broken power structure that allows cliques to game the rules and control the narrative on articles.