The truth about AntiVax

VACCINES ARE GOOD FOR YOU, THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED
MY PEER-REJEWED STUDY SAYS SO

Yes, measles vaccine is not necessary imo, but this must be a a joke re: fat-soluble vitamins.

Too much fat soluble vitamins (beta carotene in particular) is overloading livers. Liver disease is skyrocketing.

Stupid millenial parents are ODing their kids on carrots & their kids are turning orange, hypervitaminosis A.

Ya wtf is up with this? A lot of my norman friends have been posting anti-vax memes out of nowhere lately.

If the vaccines work then there wouldnt be vaccinated people falling ill with the diseases. Yes, the shitskins coming in are the reason that there has been outbreaks, but if the vaccines worked in the first place this wouldnt be the case. That is ONE of the reasons for the "muh stupid antivaxxers are to blame" because SOMETHING has to be blamed but if that something to be blamed is shitskins, or even the kikes pushing ineffective vaccines, then OY FUCKING VEY!

So, what better way to handle it then by accusing the people you are attacking with shitskin invasion of causing what the shitskin invasion is responsible for? Its peak pilpul meets peak hegelian dialectic.

But, then too, it is also about continuing the original attack. If you are attacking someone, then what better way to be able to continue attacking them then convincing everyone that any claims that anyone aside from the people you are attacking are the ones to blame is insanity, and maybe even borderline criminal!

all the measles shit in the news lately is telling, they are definitely trying to prime everyone for a massive psyop but I cant figure out exactly what it would be.

There is an obvious attempt at association between anti-vax and the flat earth "conspiracy". Such "conspiracies" are always disseminated to weaken those actual questions of authority and concerns of validity.
At the very least, this dissemination is because various industries fear lost profits; at the very worst it is because the antivaxxers are right.

If we imagine an individual having the option to choose between several measles vaccines, then the problem is made apparent.
There can be no 'free play of economic forces' in the world of vaccination. For the public lacks the knowledge to assess vaccinations, and an individual cannot revoke their choice of vaccine.
In reality, the choice of any individual is limited to a single vaccine for any disease.

The argument is always based upon the sovereignty or the common good of the industries, and their mercenaries. In the sovereign case, they point to the storied history of its saintly immunologists, as if this at all guarantees all its current, and future, employees some divine grace. In the common good case, they argue that any generated profits are secondary to the concern for the wellbeing and health of the public; that these businesses suffer no immediate losses, economic or otherwise, from the failure of their vaccines shows these guarantees as empty. Nor could the business guarantee the continuance of this work for the common good, given the inevitable changes to its policies with changes to its staff and conditions.

The basis of the problem is Protocol Governance.

The governance by rule – the if A, then B – has occurred, increasingly, throughout history. It is the underlying premise of all bureaucratic systems, religious literalism, democratic governance, peer-to-peer and blockchain governance, statistical governance and rule of law. The variation in content belies the unifying element – the absolute sovereignty of the automatic protocol over human judgement.

This protocol governance always originates from the failure of political structures and their underpinning philosophical systems. The response by society to this failure is always a compulsion to scapegoat and sacrifice. The variation then, in this response, is the placement of this scapegoating upon the actors within the system, or the system itself.

While I agree there's a heavy-handed deflection going on about who is bringing all these diseases back into our societies, I believe there are much more to the whole media/plebbitor vaccine circus going on. There are several other, in many cases fundamental, issues with the vaccinations they want to keep out of normalfag minds. And I'm not talking about autism or any of that now, personally I think that's a red herring too (even though it might be true.)

First of all, I feel a large part of the whole vaccine thing is about scaring the population. A long time ago when I started looking into statistics for diseases and vaccinations, trying to form an opinion on a topic that seemed controversial, I discovered something very few people talk about in this debate. Namely how most of the diseases we vaccinate against are not that fucking dangerous in the first place. Measles is a good example. You will see media propaganda posts going "measles kill 20 million each year!!" and every plebbitor shits their pants. But then you find out that these are a tiny fraction of people contracting measles, people in the third world who are severely malnutritioned and pre-stone age hygienic practices. Latest stats from Oxford shows that in the western world people who die from measles after contraction are 1 in 5000. I'd like you to think about that number for a while. At the peak of measles epidemics in the pre-vaccination age, about 500 people died each year in the US. That's less than people who die from slipping in the bath-tub or falls off their bike. Do you see plebbitors being hysterical about putting helmets on their kids whenever they go out, or installing safety harnesses in their bath-tubs? Something very irrational is going on here. I won't even go into the flu, because who in their right mind would be afraid of the flu? Only 10-15 years ago the flu was something you got every other year and didn't think any of it. The reality is that only completely immunodeficient babies or 90 year olds die from a large swath of what's vaccinated against. Not really something to justify a hysterical, society-wide, multi-billion dollar industry. What I'm trying to say is that the fear of many of these diseases is blown way out of proportion.

Which leads me to my second point, that vaccines are pretty dysgenic in themselves. How is this going to pan out over time, when we're saving immunodeficient people so they can breed into the population. How can natural selection pressure for surviving all these easymode diseases persist when there's no reason to? So what will all this do to us some generations down the line? Will our descendants one day need these vaccines so they don't actually die from harmless shit like measles and the flu?

Vaccines would be fine if they didn't put mercury and other poisons in them

Attached: 38992b7e8add85963d48229b3314447d393fd1faa090595ae2b15dd0d143925b.jpg (450x320, 29.66K)

vaccinations do nothing to prevent the spread of diseases and do everything to create autistic, sterile, faggot tranny children

there's a reason the system injects kids and pregnant women with heavy metals and poison, and it's not to protect them from some nigger disease

System in 2070
Remember: