This was the endgame, niggers.
I knew he was doing it to counter the "kill all white males at birth because a Jewish Latino was set up to be the patsy at the latest Scott Israel multiple-shooter mass murder" shooting.
It was about optics at that time. That time has passed.
I wonder if a negro rapes a snake they will use that to call for more mandatory abortions of white children?
LOL how about YOU show US the GRAND SUPERIORITY of the stupid CNC-machined "made to be cheaply mass-produced" crap baffles in those suppressors.
I can tell by looking they are designed for one thing, and one thing only: fast and easy to crank out for ridiculous levels of profit. They sure ain't designed for maximum sound suppression.
i bet they're even aluminum, too, to top it off. Nothing says stealth like your aluminum can flopping off your weapon because it melted.
A coward in a maga hat.
maximum suppression is achieved by putting more baffles therefor making your suppressor longer. a 10 inch suppressor will seem much quieter than a 5 inch with the same internal design. more baffles=more suppression. but if youre shooting supersonic bullets as long as the crack of the bullet breaking the sound barrier is louder than the shot then effectively it doesnt matter how many db’s it reduces as your location will be disguised by the round echoing its entire flight. worrying about maximum suppression is for subsonic rounds. do you honestly think one baffle geometry drastically reduces noise over another when there isnt 1 suppressor on the market performing way better than the others in the same size range?
Illegally creating firearms bans by skirting around congress and editing them onto already existing unrelated laws while refusing to use the same tactic for anything related to illegal/mass immigration is, repeat after me: Four dee chess!
What's wrong with clowns?
Meanwhile the GOA is in Michigan
One of the government’s lawyers brought up the Las Vegas shooting from 2017 as a reason to ban bump stocks. He claimed that the inherent dangerousness of bump stocks necessitated a ban for the sake of “public safety.”
Of course, if this logic were to prevail, the government could justify banning all weapons – handguns, rifles, shotguns, etc. – given that all these weapons are inherently “dangerous.”
GOA’s attorney countered by telling the judge there is no actual proof of one recorded instance where bump stocks have been used in a crime.
Olson even cited the lack of FBI and ATF statements, studies or reports to demonstrate that there is no conclusive evidence that a bump stock was actually used by the Las Vegas shooter.
This was something of a “mic drop” moment, because when given the chance to respond, the government’s lawyer could not – in fact, he refused to – counter Olson’s statement on this point.
Thus, the oral arguments in the Western district federal court on March 6 established unrebutted testimony that, to date, there is no proof of any documented case where a bump stock was used in a crime.
Even if it is one day determined conclusively that the Las Vegas shooting was the first case where a bump stock was used in a crime – it would still remain the ONLY case.
thanks trump
