YELLOW VEST XIX EDITION

Bump

The (((SJWs))) were able to infiltrate Occupy, institute the progressive stack, and totally fuck over the movement.

A leaderless movement cannot be (((coopted))) or (((subverted))). The symbols can be stolen, as the maskfags did, but Anonymous is not the mask and the maskfags now hold nothing.
But Tor man the OG french revolution won because they had monetary and a leader who personifeid the movement into something functional(Napoleon),and waht help did anonymous agints the (((ZOG)))

I fucked beyond belief anons.

(heiled)
Yes you did.


Is that the crap they're teaching in history classes these days?
Napoleon staged a coup against the original revolutionaries and took power when the Revolution collapsed under its own weight of proto-SJW bullshit. The ancien regime fell because they had become utterly detached from reality, but the original Revolution wasn't much better. The French Revolution was also organized by (((guess who))) and was an effort to loot the vast wealth of France. It almost worked, until Napoleon came on the scene.

Then (((they))) produced their next strategy—-Communism. Seriously, compare the early French Revolution and early Soviet Revolution—-they both did some of the same strange things, like adopting a "more logical" new calendar or the same efforts at (((reforming))) religion.
The French Revolution initially advanced a "Cult of Reason" but then tried their own new "Cult of the Supreme Being" when the people weren't very interested. That didn't work either, and the Revolution fell to Napoleon before they could try again. The Soviets simply declared religion banned and attempted to impose their own "Cult of Reason" by force—-something the French Revolution, with their lofty declarations of human rights and honest revolutionaries, couldn't do. The (((Soviets))) simply ignored their own proclamations whenever they were inconvenient.

> waht help did anonymous agints the (((ZOG)))
Anonymous still exists. Against the (((ZOG))) that's quite an achievement all by itself. Just look at all the (((shills))) they send here, yet Anonymous is still Anonymous.
Have you noticed that more and more sites are removing or moderating comment sections? Our memes are sliding the Overton window against (((them))) and they are panicking already.
Our ultimate victory is watching (((them))) oven themselves out of pure fear. Get the popcorn. It's coming. I feel it.

>A leaderless movement cannot be (((coopted))) or (((subverted))

bull shit , a leaderless movement is easily coopted by any one /small group making its self the leader.. This is why anarchy movements fail. At their core they are too weak to not be corrupted but also too weak to survive.

Once any one person sees that its corupted they just move on because there were nevery strong ties.

While a movement with a strong leadership can kick anyone out for not towing the line. This is why leadership is important.

THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A STRONG MOVEMENT WITHOUT STRONG LEADERSHIP

And how exactly is that supposed to work in a leaderless movement that expressly rejects the concept of a leader?

< "I am the leader of Anonymous"
Yeah-yeah-yeah, sure you are, go kys faggot.

That´s why the movement needs to evolve into something more strong,but who is going to do it?
I would but i am not French and i don´t have the money to stay there

Have you guys seen this one?
twitter.com/leGneral2/status/1115193842045726722