the board is pretty much dead currently, I'm just responding on whatever is on top at this point.
Tito was right! Croatians are Slavs, not Goths. And that's a good thing
Wyatt Sanders
Camden Foster
It was very nationalist. National interest first, ethnic homogeneity, strong army, national central bank, major industries controlled by the people, celebration of work and ethics, high importance for culture and folklore etc. It was something closest to the Reich post WW2. Sure, it had many flaws and Tito was most likely a kike, but calling it communist is just wrong.
Which didn't include most parts of modern Croatia
Gavin Roberts
Aiden Edwards
Looks like most of modern croatia to me..
Dominic Martinez
Not yet.
Ayden Butler
compared to modern western standards, it was probably more homogenous and white than any country in europe lol, probably northkorea tier homogeneity. Thats how dictatorship works man.
Colton Hughes
This is spot on. It was traditionalist in the same way the rest of the eastern bloc was except less because it wasn't behind the iron curtain or obedient to USSR but I wouldn't call it NatSoc by any means. It came about a 100 years too late to really unify the Balkan peoples but Tito did fairly well with what he had, just a shame what happened afterwards.
Elijah James
Sigh… just leave this board
Yeah, I agree. If he only had one more generation of dictator to set things straight. Maybe his son or something and everything would have flattened itself out. He only finished the job halfway.
Matthew James
Is that the Russian Liberation Army? They literally collaborated with Croatia in WW2. Existence must be painful for you.
Henry Parker
Ethnic and religious heterogeneity actually helped stoke the flames of war in the nineties. Compared to modern Western standards though you are right.