It's very simple user. Imagine there will be a conflict between two opposing tribes, Tribe A and Tribe B. You're in Tribe A but not much of a warrior, you're unsure if your tribe will win out, so you form a self serving strategy: "I will publicly promote peace between the two tribes to appear impartial." This public appearance of impartiality is crucial to his plans because it gives him a calculated risk in a gamble. Here's the distribution:
2/3 pay off all while evading taking place in the tribal conflict. His strategy is no different than the Jew, set up banks on both sides and loan to both, you don't care for the winner you only care that neither side kills you/your bank.
Dodging the point. His was regression to the mean for Africans which can be anywhere from the mid 60's at worst to ~85 at best. English chavs, if they regress to the mean, will still average out around 100IQ. Again your general statements are incorrect and only show that you care not one iota for truth.