Brilliant analysis of the NZ shooting

I think there is still room for it. The political solution requires cooperation across sides. Of course everything is against people listening. The minions of the elite are controlling each side.

I converted very shortly after he did this helped push me over the edge.

Why even validate the glow in the dark talking point that it was a false flag?

WHAT WAS TARRANT DOING IN ISRAEL?

And have you seen any EVIDENCE of that happening? Or have you instead seen the exact opposite, a polarization and radicalization between sides? And you'll note that the anti-White libshit kikes and their niggermonkey pets have become quite open about their lust for total White genocide recently. I shouldn't need to show you evidence of this because YOU ALREADY KNOW IT. And it will only get more viscous and more violent as the number of Whites dwindles. I think you already know that too.

Attached: 138916dc74706513301a42d62cf76c32dbf70badd3c4948aea747ec859d8f56d.jpg (1114x730, 227K)

That's true, but note I was referring to the other guy citing a judgement that said police have no duty to protect, something the justices thought to deny people. My point was that while as you say there are vulnerabilities pre-existing, my point was that according to the cited legal judgement from these justices, a rogue police group could LEGALLY ALLOW if they were radioed a massacre of the supreme court or Congress WITHOUT ANY prosecutions possible against them, according to the Supreme Court itself. This is a much bigger opening than ignoring it. A rogue marshall or police chief could legally stand down his police before the massacre without any legal repercussions of any kind.

Sure but language like that can only increase the gap. If you focus instead on the latter part you'll notice there are a load of minions who pick up the elite message to spread it and become carriers of the elite message. If you clip them out there are less or no ways of control.

Obviously he went there for nine days and in those nine days was converted into the ultimate Mossad assassin with jewish magic.

Great post, that sums it up 100%

Attached: 004.png (1024x768, 537.39K)

What WAS he doing? Do you have an answer, some sort of evidence, even a TINY SHRED of evidence of just what he was doing? Instead of asking us, why not go sleuth it out on your own. If I was doing the whole "travel the world to get pumped up about ventilating mudslimes" tour, I'd stop by israhell too. Bet your ass I would, it's called 'nightmare fuel'. But again, right back at you bud: what WAS he doing? You have no clue and neither does anyone else.


Decent point, but you're missing a key element here: THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT WHAT LAW IS BASED ON. I know this because I know judges, and I've had the "US went bankrupt in 1933" discussion both with them and here as well. You labor under a delusion that rule of law still exists when, sadly, it does not. You have "color of law", obscure precedents, legalese a language I can nearly assure you that you cannot speak, although I can, and selective enforcement. If the "law" is only selectively enforced, can it really be called a "law" at all? No. These are edicts to be used against the people one wishes to enslave and then genocide. But you're asking the right questions. Almost.


And this is the part where I say
GOOD
I want that gap to increase to the level that I no longer need to be aware of the people trying to genocide me. And at this point, with murderous intent declared publicly and in triplicate, that means physical removal. Once you connect enough dots you too will understand what high-IQ individuals like Tarrant figured out: the sword is already drawn and first blood is a memory we were born without. We were born into this war, it wasn't our choice. But when someone attempts to kill you and everyone you love, you have to make decisions you'd rather not make.